Big Game by StateThe public record of western draws

Idaho · Moose · Hunt 3077

Idaho moose controlled hunt 3077

How many hunters put this controlled hunt first and how many of them drew it — season by season, for both of Idaho's application periods and both residency pools. Every figure comes from an Idaho Fish and Game response linked at the foot of this page.

What the 2026 drawing did

Idaho offered 10 permits on hunt 3077 in 2026 and issued 10 — the hunt filled. In the first application period, 170 hunters put it first and 10 drew, 5.88%.

Idaho grants no preference for having applied before. The department is direct about it — "IDFG does not use any point system in our draw process" — and its own published data has never carried a point, preference or bonus field in the twenty-nine seasons it covers. Applying for eleven years earns exactly what applying for the first time earns. There is no points-to-draw figure on this page because there is none to publish, and any site showing you one for Idaho has invented it.

Published in 29 of the 29 seasons Idaho offers, 1998 to 2026.

Application period
Residency

First-choice draw rate, by season

The rate is the hunters awarded this hunt on their first choice, divided by the hunters who named it first. Both are exact integers Idaho Fish and Game returns in the same record. A dash means nobody named it first, so the drawing answered nothing — absent, not nought.
SeasonPeriodAreaPermits availablePut it firstDrew on first choiceFirst-choice draw ratePut it secondDrew on second choicePermits issued
2026First69-110170105.88%76010
2025First69-110130107.69%55010
2024First69-110122108.20%61010
2023First69-110122108.20%65010
2022First69-3537513.51%2305
2021First69-3533515.15%1405
2020First69-3519526.32%2205
2019First69-3533515.15%705
2018First70611665.17%2306
2017First70612065.00%4306
2016First69-3*518527.78%1705
2015First69-3*532515.63%1505
2014First71-2514535.71%1005
2013First71-2514535.71%905
2012First66A10741013.51%29010
2011First66A10105109.52%43010
2010First61-110791012.66%20010
2009First61-110771012.99%39010
2008Second19-116116.67%101
2008First19-1433100.00%103
2007First19-1410440.00%904
2006First61-315511529.41%36015
2005First61-315691521.74%41015
2004First66-222822226.83%43022
2003First66-222882225.00%76022
2002First67-115431534.88%23015
2001First67-115331545.45%20015
2000First60241272418.90%60024
1999First60242232410.76%127024
1998First6212741216.22%67012

Idaho draws each hunt twice. The first application period is where almost everybody applies; the second is a real second drawing for what is left. They are different competitions and nothing here averages them.

The area label changes across seasons for this hunt number — Idaho printed 69-1, 69-3, 70, 69-3*, 71-2, 66A, 61-1, 19-1, 61-3, 66-2, 67-1, 60, 62. A controlled hunt number is reissued, and the department publishes nothing that settles whether the same number covers the same ground from one season to the next: across all its hunts, 874 of 974 numbers see its own internal area key change and 888 see the printed label change, independently of each other. So each row shows the label Idaho printed for that season and this page asserts nothing about the place.

By residency

Idaho splits both applicants and permits by residency. The applicant counts are first-choice only in every season; the permit counts are not, which is why some rates here are blank.
SeasonPeriodResidencyPut it firstPermitsDraw rateWhat the permit count coversIDFG's own figure
2026FirstResident12197.44%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree7%
2026FirstNonresident4912.04%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree2%
2025FirstResident10498.65%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree9%
2025FirstNonresident2613.85%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree4%
2024FirstResident9499.57%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree10%
2024FirstNonresident2813.57%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree4%
2023FirstResident10099.00%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree9%
2023FirstNonresident2214.55%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree5%
2022FirstResident29413.79%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree14%
2022FirstNonresident8112.50%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree12%
2021FirstResident28517.86%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree18%
2021FirstNonresident500.00%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree0%
2020FirstResident16531.25%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree31%
2020FirstNonresident300.00%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree0%
2019FirstResident27518.52%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree19%
2019FirstNonresident600.00%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree0%
2018FirstResident8056.25%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree6%
2018FirstNonresident3612.78%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree3%
2017FirstResident7956.33%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree6%
2017FirstNonresident4112.44%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree2%
2016FirstResident17529.41%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree29%
2016FirstNonresident100.00%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree0%
2015FirstResident31516.13%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree16%
2015FirstNonresident100.00%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree0%
2014FirstResident13538.46%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree38%
2014FirstNonresident100.00%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree0%
2013FirstResident14535.71%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree36%
2013FirstNonresident00—no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree0%
2012FirstResident68913.24%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree13%
2012FirstNonresident6116.67%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree17%
2011FirstResident931010.75%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree11%
2011FirstNonresident1200.00%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree0%
2010FirstResident76911.84%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree12%
2010FirstNonresident3133.33%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree33%
2009FirstResident751013.33%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree13%
2009FirstNonresident200.00%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree0%
2008SecondResident6116.67%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree17%
2008SecondNonresident00—no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree0%
2008FirstResident33100.00%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree100%
2008FirstNonresident00—no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree0%
2007FirstResident6350.00%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree50%
2007FirstNonresident4125.00%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree25%
2006FirstResident501530.00%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree30%
2006FirstNonresident100.00%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree0%
2005FirstResident661522.73%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree23%
2005FirstNonresident300.00%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree0%
2004FirstResident692028.99%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree29%
2004FirstNonresident13215.38%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree15%
2003FirstResident752026.67%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree26%
2003FirstNonresident13215.38%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree15%
2002FirstResident371540.54%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree40%
2002FirstNonresident600.00%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree0%
2001FirstResident251456.00%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree56%
2001FirstNonresident8112.50%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree12%
2000FirstResident1272418.90%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree18%
2000FirstNonresident00—no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree100%
1999FirstResident2232410.76%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree10%
1999FirstNonresident00—no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree100%
1998FirstResident741216.22%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree16%
1998FirstNonresident00—no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree100%

Why some residency rates are blank. Idaho changed what its residency permit columns count around the 2019 season without renaming them. Before, they cover both application choices; from 2019, first choice only. The applicant columns are first-choice-only throughout. So on an older row where permits went to second-choice hunters, dividing one by the other counts winners the denominator never counted — on one 1998 deer hunt that arithmetic gives 250%. Rather than publish that, or pick an era and apply it to every row, this site reads which meaning each row's own totals support and leaves the rate empty where the two do not match.

IDFG's own figure is the percentage the department publishes alongside its counts. It is a rounded summary and it disagrees with its own rows: on the 1998 hunt above it reads 100. It is shown because the department publishes it and a reader will meet it elsewhere, not because it answers the question this page is about.

Where Idaho's own figures disagree with each other

  • IDFG printed 13 different area labels for moose hunt 3077 across the seasons it published (19-1, 60, 61-1, 61-3, 62, 66-2, 66A, 67-1, 69-1, 69-3, 69-3*, 70, 71-2). Neither its label nor its internal area key is an identity, so this site shows what the department printed for each season and asserts nothing about whether the ground is the same.

Nothing above is corrected. Correcting it would mean publishing a figure the department never stated.

Sources for this hunt

  • moose/2026-draw1.json — Idaho Fish and Game controlled hunt drawing odds, 2026 season, fetched 2026-09-03
  • moose/2025-draw1.json — Idaho Fish and Game controlled hunt drawing odds, 2025 season, fetched 2026-09-03
  • moose/2024-draw1.json — Idaho Fish and Game controlled hunt drawing odds, 2024 season, fetched 2026-09-03
  • moose/2023-draw1.json — Idaho Fish and Game controlled hunt drawing odds, 2023 season, fetched 2026-09-03
  • moose/2022-draw1.json — Idaho Fish and Game controlled hunt drawing odds, 2022 season, fetched 2026-09-03
  • moose/2021-draw1.json — Idaho Fish and Game controlled hunt drawing odds, 2021 season, fetched 2026-09-03
  • moose/2020-draw1.json — Idaho Fish and Game controlled hunt drawing odds, 2020 season, fetched 2026-09-03
  • moose/2019-draw1.json — Idaho Fish and Game controlled hunt drawing odds, 2019 season, fetched 2026-09-03
  • moose/2018-draw1.json — Idaho Fish and Game controlled hunt drawing odds, 2018 season, fetched 2026-09-03
  • moose/2017-draw1.json — Idaho Fish and Game controlled hunt drawing odds, 2017 season, fetched 2026-09-03
  • moose/2016-draw1.json — Idaho Fish and Game controlled hunt drawing odds, 2016 season, fetched 2026-09-03
  • moose/2015-draw1.json — Idaho Fish and Game controlled hunt drawing odds, 2015 season, fetched 2026-09-03
  • moose/2014-draw1.json — Idaho Fish and Game controlled hunt drawing odds, 2014 season, fetched 2026-09-03
  • moose/2013-draw1.json — Idaho Fish and Game controlled hunt drawing odds, 2013 season, fetched 2026-09-03
  • moose/2012-draw1.json — Idaho Fish and Game controlled hunt drawing odds, 2012 season, fetched 2026-09-03
  • moose/2011-draw1.json — Idaho Fish and Game controlled hunt drawing odds, 2011 season, fetched 2026-09-03
  • moose/2010-draw1.json — Idaho Fish and Game controlled hunt drawing odds, 2010 season, fetched 2026-09-03
  • moose/2009-draw1.json — Idaho Fish and Game controlled hunt drawing odds, 2009 season, fetched 2026-09-03
  • moose/2008-draw2.json — Idaho Fish and Game controlled hunt drawing odds, 2008 season, fetched 2026-09-03
  • moose/2008-draw1.json — Idaho Fish and Game controlled hunt drawing odds, 2008 season, fetched 2026-09-03
  • moose/2007-draw1.json — Idaho Fish and Game controlled hunt drawing odds, 2007 season, fetched 2026-09-03
  • moose/2006-draw1.json — Idaho Fish and Game controlled hunt drawing odds, 2006 season, fetched 2026-09-03
  • moose/2005-draw1.json — Idaho Fish and Game controlled hunt drawing odds, 2005 season, fetched 2026-09-03
  • moose/2004-draw1.json — Idaho Fish and Game controlled hunt drawing odds, 2004 season, fetched 2026-09-03
  • moose/2003-draw1.json — Idaho Fish and Game controlled hunt drawing odds, 2003 season, fetched 2026-09-03
  • moose/2002-draw1.json — Idaho Fish and Game controlled hunt drawing odds, 2002 season, fetched 2026-09-03
  • moose/2001-draw1.json — Idaho Fish and Game controlled hunt drawing odds, 2001 season, fetched 2026-09-03
  • moose/2000-draw1.json — Idaho Fish and Game controlled hunt drawing odds, 2000 season, fetched 2026-09-03
  • moose/1999-draw1.json — Idaho Fish and Game controlled hunt drawing odds, 1999 season, fetched 2026-09-03
  • moose/1998-draw1.json — Idaho Fish and Game controlled hunt drawing odds, 1998 season, fetched 2026-09-03

Nearby hunt numbers

Idaho grants no preference to previously unsuccessful applicants, so nothing on this page accumulates and nothing here predicts next season. See how these numbers are produced and checked, or the Idaho application deadlines.