Big Game by StateThe public record of western draws

Idaho · Mountain Goat · Hunt 6017

Idaho mountain goat controlled hunt 6017

How many hunters put this controlled hunt first and how many of them drew it — season by season, for both of Idaho's application periods and both residency pools. Every figure comes from an Idaho Fish and Game response linked at the foot of this page.

What the 2026 drawing did

Idaho offered 6 permits on hunt 6017 in 2026 and issued 6 — the hunt filled. In the first application period, 161 hunters put it first and 6 drew, 3.73%.

Idaho grants no preference for having applied before. The department is direct about it — "IDFG does not use any point system in our draw process" — and its own published data has never carried a point, preference or bonus field in the twenty-nine seasons it covers. Applying for eleven years earns exactly what applying for the first time earns. There is no points-to-draw figure on this page because there is none to publish, and any site showing you one for Idaho has invented it.

Published in 27 of the 29 seasons Idaho offers, 1998 to 2026.

Residency

First-choice draw rate, by season

The rate is the hunters awarded this hunt on their first choice, divided by the hunters who named it first. Both are exact integers Idaho Fish and Game returns in the same record. A dash means nobody named it first, so the drawing answered nothing — absent, not nought.
SeasonAreaPermits availablePut it firstDrew on first choiceFirst-choice draw ratePut it secondDrew on second choicePermits issued
202650616163.73%5106
202550614164.26%4406
202443611965.04%3506
202343610665.66%5806
202243510354.85%3405
202143510854.63%3305
20204345347.55%3204
20194346845.88%1904
201837A*11516.67%1101
201737A*12314.35%701
201637A*12314.35%1201
201537A*11317.69%1401
20143911417.14%601
20133922328.70%1202
201239218211.11%1002
20113922328.70%1102
201051*34636.52%1803
200951*36035.00%3303
200851*35135.88%3303
200751*37334.11%2903
200643*214214.29%702
200543*22428.33%1702
20026734536.67%1503
20016734936.12%1603
200067-110831012.05%32010
199967-110105109.52%25010
199867-2421419.05%6204

The area label changes across seasons for this hunt number — Idaho printed 50, 43, 37A*, 39, 51*, 43*, 67, 67-1, 67-2. A controlled hunt number is reissued, and the department publishes nothing that settles whether the same number covers the same ground from one season to the next: across all its hunts, 874 of 974 numbers see its own internal area key change and 888 see the printed label change, independently of each other. So each row shows the label Idaho printed for that season and this page asserts nothing about the place.

By residency

Idaho splits both applicants and permits by residency. The applicant counts are first-choice only in every season; the permit counts are not, which is why some rates here are blank.
SeasonResidencyPut it firstPermitsDraw rateWhat the permit count coversIDFG's own figure
2026Resident13953.60%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree4%
2026Nonresident2214.55%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree5%
2025Resident13164.58%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree5%
2025Nonresident1000.00%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree0%
2024Resident9266.52%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree7%
2024Nonresident2700.00%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree0%
2023Resident7956.33%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree6%
2023Nonresident2713.70%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree4%
2022Resident9144.40%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree4%
2022Nonresident1218.33%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree0%
2021Resident9055.56%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree6%
2021Nonresident1800.00%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree0%
2020Resident4449.09%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree9%
2020Nonresident900.00%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree0%
2019Resident5846.90%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree7%
2019Nonresident1000.00%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree0%
2018Resident1218.33%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree8%
2018Nonresident300.00%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree0%
2017Resident1417.14%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree7%
2017Nonresident900.00%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree0%
2016Resident1715.88%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree6%
2016Nonresident600.00%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree0%
2015Resident1317.69%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree8%
2015Nonresident00—no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree0%
2014Resident1119.09%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree9%
2014Nonresident300.00%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree0%
2013Resident2129.52%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree10%
2013Nonresident200.00%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree0%
2012Resident1317.69%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree8%
2012Nonresident5120.00%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree20%
2011Resident20210.00%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree10%
2011Nonresident300.00%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree0%
2010Resident4137.32%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree7%
2010Nonresident500.00%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree0%
2009Resident4736.38%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree6%
2009Nonresident1300.00%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree0%
2008Resident3638.33%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree8%
2008Nonresident1500.00%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree0%
2007Resident4436.82%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree7%
2007Nonresident2900.00%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree0%
2006Resident12216.67%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree17%
2006Nonresident200.00%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree0%
2005Resident2129.52%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree10%
2005Nonresident300.00%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree0%
2002Resident3339.09%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree9%
2002Nonresident1200.00%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree0%
2001Resident3625.56%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree5%
2001Nonresident1317.69%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree7%
2000Resident74912.16%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree12%
2000Nonresident9111.11%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree11%
1999Resident9399.68%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree9%
1999Nonresident1218.33%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree8%
1998Resident19315.79%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree15%
1998Nonresident2150.00%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree50%

Why some residency rates are blank. Idaho changed what its residency permit columns count around the 2019 season without renaming them. Before, they cover both application choices; from 2019, first choice only. The applicant columns are first-choice-only throughout. So on an older row where permits went to second-choice hunters, dividing one by the other counts winners the denominator never counted — on one 1998 deer hunt that arithmetic gives 250%. Rather than publish that, or pick an era and apply it to every row, this site reads which meaning each row's own totals support and leaves the rate empty where the two do not match.

IDFG's own figure is the percentage the department publishes alongside its counts. It is a rounded summary and it disagrees with its own rows: on the 1998 hunt above it reads 100. It is shown because the department publishes it and a reader will meet it elsewhere, not because it answers the question this page is about.

Where Idaho's own figures disagree with each other

  • IDFG printed 9 different area labels for mountain-goat hunt 6017 across the seasons it published (37A*, 39, 43, 43*, 50, 51*, 67, 67-1, 67-2). Neither its label nor its internal area key is an identity, so this site shows what the department printed for each season and asserts nothing about whether the ground is the same.

Nothing above is corrected. Correcting it would mean publishing a figure the department never stated.

Sources for this hunt

Nearby hunt numbers

Hunt 6012Hunt 6013Hunt 6014Hunt 6015Hunt 6016Hunt 6018Hunt 6019Hunt 6020Hunt 6021All Idaho mountain goatAll Idaho species

Idaho grants no preference to previously unsuccessful applicants, so nothing on this page accumulates and nothing here predicts next season. See how these numbers are produced and checked, or the Idaho application deadlines.