Big Game by StateThe public record of western draws

Idaho · Pronghorn · Hunt 4038

Idaho pronghorn controlled hunt 4038

How many hunters put this controlled hunt first and how many of them drew it — season by season, for both of Idaho's application periods and both residency pools. Every figure comes from an Idaho Fish and Game response linked at the foot of this page.

What the 2026 drawing did

Idaho offered 25 permits on hunt 4038 in 2026 and issued 25 — the hunt filled. In the first application period, 147 hunters put it first and 25 drew, 17.01%.

Idaho grants no preference for having applied before. The department is direct about it — "IDFG does not use any point system in our draw process" — and its own published data has never carried a point, preference or bonus field in the twenty-nine seasons it covers. Applying for eleven years earns exactly what applying for the first time earns. There is no points-to-draw figure on this page because there is none to publish, and any site showing you one for Idaho has invented it.

Published in 18 of the 29 seasons Idaho offers, 2009 to 2026.

Application period
Residency

First-choice draw rate, by season

The rate is the hunters awarded this hunt on their first choice, divided by the hunters who named it first. Both are exact integers Idaho Fish and Game returns in the same record. A dash means nobody named it first, so the drawing answered nothing — absent, not nought.
SeasonPeriodAreaPermits availablePut it firstDrew on first choiceFirst-choice draw ratePut it secondDrew on second choicePermits issued
2026First54251472517.01%61025
2025First54251292519.38%85025
2024First51-2326326326100.00%00326
2023First51-2367367367100.00%00367
2022First52A-1209209209100.00%00209
2021First52A-1no cap151151100.00%00151
2020Second6811218.33%301
2020First6820562035.71%24020
2019Second6847457.14%704
2019First6820812024.69%29020
2018Second68315320.00%1003
2018First6820862023.26%33020
2017Second68211218.18%402
2017First6820822024.39%41020
2016First30A401664024.10%45040
2015Second30A25123.92%602
2015First30A401294031.01%24040
2014Second30A11915.26%1401
2014First30A401214033.06%34040
2013Second36A18112.50%201
2013First36A10461021.74%12010
2012Second41435411.43%2404
2012First41401694023.67%45040
2011First41401774022.60%49040
2010Second47546510.87%1105
2010First47751457551.72%85075
2009Second32*12314.35%001
2009First32*15941515.96%8015

Idaho draws each hunt twice. The first application period is where almost everybody applies; the second is a real second drawing for what is left. They are different competitions and nothing here averages them.

No cap is a hunt Idaho drew without a permit limit. Its data carries 99,999 and 999,999 as placeholders in the permits-available field and states nowhere what they mean, so no quota is shown rather than one of those figures.

The area label changes across seasons for this hunt number — Idaho printed 54, 51-2, 52A-1, 68, 30A, 36A, 41, 47, 32*. A controlled hunt number is reissued, and the department publishes nothing that settles whether the same number covers the same ground from one season to the next: across all its hunts, 874 of 974 numbers see its own internal area key change and 888 see the printed label change, independently of each other. So each row shows the label Idaho printed for that season and this page asserts nothing about the place.

By residency

Idaho splits both applicants and permits by residency. The applicant counts are first-choice only in every season; the permit counts are not, which is why some rates here are blank.
SeasonPeriodResidencyPut it firstPermitsDraw rateWhat the permit count coversIDFG's own figure
2026FirstResident912325.27%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree25%
2026FirstNonresident5623.57%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree4%
2025FirstResident752330.67%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree31%
2025FirstNonresident5423.70%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree4%
2024FirstResident315315100.00%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree100%
2024FirstNonresident1111100.00%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree100%
2023FirstResident348348100.00%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree100%
2023FirstNonresident1919100.00%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree100%
2022FirstResident197197100.00%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree100%
2022FirstNonresident1212100.00%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree100%
2021FirstResident146146100.00%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree100%
2021FirstNonresident55100.00%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree100%
2020SecondResident1218.33%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree8%
2020SecondNonresident00—no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree0%
2020FirstResident541935.19%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree35%
2020FirstNonresident2150.00%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree50%
2019SecondResident6466.67%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree67%
2019SecondNonresident100.00%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree0%
2019FirstResident802025.00%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree25%
2019FirstNonresident100.00%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree0%
2018SecondResident15320.00%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree20%
2018SecondNonresident00—no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree0%
2018FirstResident862023.26%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree23%
2018FirstNonresident00—no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree0%
2017SecondResident11218.18%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree18%
2017SecondNonresident00—no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree0%
2017FirstResident812024.69%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree25%
2017FirstNonresident100.00%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree0%
2016FirstResident1573622.93%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree23%
2016FirstNonresident9444.44%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree44%
2015SecondResident5123.92%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree4%
2015SecondNonresident00—no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree0%
2015FirstResident1243830.65%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree31%
2015FirstNonresident5240.00%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree40%
2014SecondResident1715.88%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree6%
2014SecondNonresident200.00%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree0%
2014FirstResident1153833.04%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree33%
2014FirstNonresident6233.33%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree33%
2013SecondResident8112.50%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree12%
2013SecondNonresident00—no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree0%
2013FirstResident461021.74%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree22%
2013FirstNonresident00—no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree0%
2012SecondResident34411.76%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree12%
2012SecondNonresident100.00%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree0%
2012FirstResident1623722.84%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree23%
2012FirstNonresident7342.86%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree43%
2011FirstResident1663923.49%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree23%
2011FirstNonresident1119.09%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree9%
2010SecondResident45511.11%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree11%
2010SecondNonresident100.00%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree0%
2010FirstResident1417351.77%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree52%
2010FirstNonresident4250.00%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree50%
2009SecondResident2314.35%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree4%
2009SecondNonresident00—no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree0%
2009FirstResident911516.48%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree16%
2009FirstNonresident300.00%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree0%

Why some residency rates are blank. Idaho changed what its residency permit columns count around the 2019 season without renaming them. Before, they cover both application choices; from 2019, first choice only. The applicant columns are first-choice-only throughout. So on an older row where permits went to second-choice hunters, dividing one by the other counts winners the denominator never counted — on one 1998 deer hunt that arithmetic gives 250%. Rather than publish that, or pick an era and apply it to every row, this site reads which meaning each row's own totals support and leaves the rate empty where the two do not match.

IDFG's own figure is the percentage the department publishes alongside its counts. It is a rounded summary and it disagrees with its own rows: on the 1998 hunt above it reads 100. It is shown because the department publishes it and a reader will meet it elsewhere, not because it answers the question this page is about.

Where Idaho's own figures disagree with each other

  • IDFG printed 9 different area labels for pronghorn hunt 4038 across the seasons it published (30A, 32*, 36A, 41, 47, 51-2, 52A-1, 54, 68). Neither its label nor its internal area key is an identity, so this site shows what the department printed for each season and asserts nothing about whether the ground is the same.

Nothing above is corrected. Correcting it would mean publishing a figure the department never stated.

Sources for this hunt

Nearby hunt numbers

Idaho grants no preference to previously unsuccessful applicants, so nothing on this page accumulates and nothing here predicts next season. See how these numbers are produced and checked, or the Idaho application deadlines.