Big Game by StateThe public record of western draws

Idaho · Pronghorn · Hunt 4040

Idaho pronghorn controlled hunt 4040

How many hunters put this controlled hunt first and how many of them drew it — season by season, for both of Idaho's application periods and both residency pools. Every figure comes from an Idaho Fish and Game response linked at the foot of this page.

What the 2026 drawing did

Idaho offered 357 permits on hunt 4040 in 2026 and issued 357 — the hunt filled. In the first application period, 357 hunters put it first and 357 drew, 100.00%.

Idaho grants no preference for having applied before. The department is direct about it — "IDFG does not use any point system in our draw process" — and its own published data has never carried a point, preference or bonus field in the twenty-nine seasons it covers. Applying for eleven years earns exactly what applying for the first time earns. There is no points-to-draw figure on this page because there is none to publish, and any site showing you one for Idaho has invented it.

Published in 18 of the 29 seasons Idaho offers, 2009 to 2026.

Application period
Residency

First-choice draw rate, by season

The rate is the hunters awarded this hunt on their first choice, divided by the hunters who named it first. Both are exact integers Idaho Fish and Game returns in the same record. A dash means nobody named it first, so the drawing answered nothing — absent, not nought.
SeasonPeriodAreaPermits availablePut it firstDrew on first choiceFirst-choice draw ratePut it secondDrew on second choicePermits issued
2026First59A-1357357357100.00%00357
2025First59A-1410410410100.00%00410
2024First54251032524.27%60025
2023First54251082523.15%56025
2022Second55-111915.26%601
2022First55-110651015.38%15010
2021Second55-124724.26%1202
2021First55-110661015.15%39010
2020First30A402204018.18%38040
2019Second30A26822.94%1002
2019First30A402124018.87%42040
2018First30A401914020.94%24040
2017Second30A15811.72%901
2017First30A401754022.86%26040
2016Second4723226.25%1502
2016First47501565032.05%73050
2015Second4748444.76%1504
2015First47501365036.76%68050
2014Second4757756.49%2105
2014First47751637546.01%79075
2013Second4758356.02%1905
2013First47751387554.35%102075
2012First63-2501155043.48%32050
2011Second63-233139.68%1403
2011First63-2501385036.23%86050
2010Second63-2762711.29%3107
2010First63-250935053.76%107050
2009Second63-236350.00%003
2009First63-2251919100.00%18625

Idaho draws each hunt twice. The first application period is where almost everybody applies; the second is a real second drawing for what is left. They are different competitions and nothing here averages them.

The area label changes across seasons for this hunt number — Idaho printed 59A-1, 54, 55-1, 30A, 47, 63-2. A controlled hunt number is reissued, and the department publishes nothing that settles whether the same number covers the same ground from one season to the next: across all its hunts, 874 of 974 numbers see its own internal area key change and 888 see the printed label change, independently of each other. So each row shows the label Idaho printed for that season and this page asserts nothing about the place.

By residency

Idaho splits both applicants and permits by residency. The applicant counts are first-choice only in every season; the permit counts are not, which is why some rates here are blank.
SeasonPeriodResidencyPut it firstPermitsDraw rateWhat the permit count coversIDFG's own figure
2026FirstResident342342100.00%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree100%
2026FirstNonresident1515100.00%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree100%
2025FirstResident396396100.00%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree100%
2025FirstNonresident1414100.00%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree100%
2024FirstResident632336.51%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree37%
2024FirstNonresident4025.00%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree5%
2023FirstResident572340.35%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree40%
2023FirstNonresident5123.92%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree4%
2022SecondResident1715.88%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree6%
2022SecondNonresident200.00%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree0%
2022FirstResident46919.57%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree20%
2022FirstNonresident1915.26%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree5%
2021SecondResident4224.76%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree5%
2021SecondNonresident500.00%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree0%
2021FirstResident45920.00%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree20%
2021FirstNonresident2114.76%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree5%
2020FirstResident1913618.85%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree19%
2020FirstNonresident29413.79%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree14%
2019SecondResident5700.00%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree0%
2019SecondNonresident11218.18%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree18%
2019FirstResident1883719.68%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree20%
2019FirstNonresident24312.50%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree12%
2018FirstResident1683621.43%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree21%
2018FirstNonresident23417.39%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree17%
2017SecondResident5211.92%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree2%
2017SecondNonresident600.00%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree0%
2017FirstResident1633823.31%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree23%
2017FirstNonresident12216.67%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree17%
2016SecondResident2926.90%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree7%
2016SecondNonresident300.00%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree0%
2016FirstResident1505033.33%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree33%
2016FirstNonresident600.00%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree0%
2015SecondResident7945.06%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree5%
2015SecondNonresident500.00%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree0%
2015FirstResident1304937.69%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree38%
2015FirstNonresident6116.67%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree17%
2014SecondResident7356.85%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree7%
2014SecondNonresident400.00%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree0%
2014FirstResident1507449.33%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree49%
2014FirstNonresident1317.69%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree8%
2013SecondResident7845.13%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree5%
2013SecondNonresident5120.00%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree20%
2013FirstResident1317053.44%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree53%
2013FirstNonresident7571.43%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree71%
2012FirstResident1114641.44%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree41%
2012FirstNonresident44100.00%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree100%
2011SecondResident3139.68%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree10%
2011SecondNonresident00—no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree0%
2011FirstResident1385036.23%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree36%
2011FirstNonresident00—no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree0%
2010SecondResident61711.48%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree11%
2010SecondNonresident100.00%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree0%
2010FirstResident874855.17%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree55%
2010FirstNonresident6233.33%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree33%
2009SecondResident6350.00%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree50%
2009SecondNonresident00—no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree0%
2009FirstResident1924—both draw choices100%
2009FirstNonresident01—both draw choices0%

Why some residency rates are blank. Idaho changed what its residency permit columns count around the 2019 season without renaming them. Before, they cover both application choices; from 2019, first choice only. The applicant columns are first-choice-only throughout. So on an older row where permits went to second-choice hunters, dividing one by the other counts winners the denominator never counted — on one 1998 deer hunt that arithmetic gives 250%. Rather than publish that, or pick an era and apply it to every row, this site reads which meaning each row's own totals support and leaves the rate empty where the two do not match.

IDFG's own figure is the percentage the department publishes alongside its counts. It is a rounded summary and it disagrees with its own rows: on the 1998 hunt above it reads 100. It is shown because the department publishes it and a reader will meet it elsewhere, not because it answers the question this page is about.

At least one row here has hunters who applied and no rate. That is the case above, and the "what the permit count covers" column says which.

Where Idaho's own figures disagree with each other

  • IDFG printed 6 different area labels for pronghorn hunt 4040 across the seasons it published (30A, 47, 54, 55-1, 59A-1, 63-2). Neither its label nor its internal area key is an identity, so this site shows what the department printed for each season and asserts nothing about whether the ground is the same.

Nothing above is corrected. Correcting it would mean publishing a figure the department never stated.

Sources for this hunt

Nearby hunt numbers

Idaho grants no preference to previously unsuccessful applicants, so nothing on this page accumulates and nothing here predicts next season. See how these numbers are produced and checked, or the Idaho application deadlines.