Montana · Antelope · District 318

Montana antelope licence 318-00

How many people put this antelope licencefirst and how many of them drew it — year by year, separately for each of the four pools Montana draws, and separately at every bonus point level. Every figure comes from a Fish, Wildlife & Parks report linked at the foot of this page.

What the 2013 drawing did

Montana set a quota of 350 on 318-00 in 2013 and drew 348, so 2 went undrawn. Across the four pools FWP draws separately, no nonresident landowner applicant put it first; 14 resident landowner applicants put it first and 14 drew, 100.00%; 56 nonresident applicants put it first and 14 drew, 25.00%; 1,107 resident applicants put it first and 320 drew, 28.91%.

This licence code stops appearing after 2013. FWP's 2026 reports do not carry it, and this site does not map a retired code onto a current one — the department renumbered its licence-type suffixes and has published nothing saying which old code became which new one. What is below is the record of the 8 years it was drawn.

Drawing pool

First-choice success rate, by pool and year

The rate is the first-choice applicants in a pool who drew, divided by the first-choice applicants in that pool. Both are exact integers FWP printed in the same row, and it is the measure the department's own drawing statistics tool publishes: "the percentage of 1st choice applicants that were successful". A dash means nobody in that pool applied, so the draw answered nothing — absent, not nought.
Year	Pool	Pool cap	Put it first	Drew on first choice	First-choice success rate	Put it 2nd or 3rd	Drew on 2nd or 3rd
2013	Nonresident	35	56	14	25.00%	17	0
2013	Resident	350	1,107	320	28.91%	481	0
2013	Nonresident landowner	45	0	0	—	—	—
2013	Resident landowner	68	14	14	100.00%	—	—
2012	Nonresident	45	67	23	34.33%	13	0
2012	Resident	450	1,198	415	34.64%	342	0
2012	Nonresident landowner	45	0	0	—	—	—
2012	Resident landowner	68	11	11	100.00%	—	—
2011	Nonresident	45	64	22	34.38%	26	0
2011	Resident	449	1,188	413	34.76%	398	0
2011	Nonresident landowner	45	0	0	—	—	—
2011	Resident landowner	68	14	14	100.00%	—	—
2010	Nonresident	45	85	24	28.24%	23	0
2010	Resident	450	1,056	409	38.73%	311	0
2010	Nonresident landowner	45	0	0	—	—	—
2010	Resident landowner	68	16	16	100.00%	—	—
2009	Nonresident	45	54	17	31.48%	23	0
2009	Resident	450	1,013	423	41.76%	280	0
2009	Nonresident landowner	45	1	1	100.00%	—	—
2009	Resident landowner	68	9	9	100.00%	—	—
2008	Nonresident	45	50	19	38.00%	30	0
2008	Resident	450	971	416	42.84%	217	0
2008	Nonresident landowner	45	1	1	100.00%	—	—
2008	Resident landowner	68	14	14	100.00%	—	—
2007	Nonresident	45	57	22	38.60%	17	0
2007	Resident	450	983	415	42.22%	268	0
2007	Nonresident landowner	45	0	0	—	—	—
2007	Resident landowner	67	13	13	100.00%	—	—
2006	Nonresident	45	67	26	38.81%	25	0
2006	Resident	450	892	415	46.52%	253	0
2006	Nonresident landowner	45	0	0	—	—	—
2006	Resident landowner	67	9	9	100.00%	—	—

Pool cap is FWP's own QTA column, and it is a ceiling rather than an allocation. The resident regular cap equals the overall quota; the nonresident caps are ten per cent of it and cover landowner and regular nonresidents together; the resident landowner cap is fifteen per cent. The department states plainly that the ceiling is not a floor: "although the nonresident quotas are set at 10%, that entire quota may not be drawn by nonresidents", and that if every resident applicant draws, nonresidents may go over ten per cent.

Landowner rows are a different drawing, not a subset of the one below them.Landowner preference is the first stage, worth up to fifteen per cent of the quota to resident landowners, and its applicants are counted apart from the regular pool throughout. FWP publishes the landowner pools at first choice only, which is why their second and third columns are dashes rather than noughts.

Draw rate at each bonus point level

One row per bonus point level per pool per year, exactly as FWP's Detailed Bonus Point report publishes it. The rate is that level's successes divided by its applications — both exact integers in the same printed row.
Year	Pool	Bonus points	Applied	Drew	Drew at this level
2013	Nonresident	0	17	6	35.29%
2013	Nonresident	1	9	2	22.22%
2013	Nonresident	2	6	3	50.00%
2013	Nonresident	not stated	24	3	12.50%
2013	Resident	0	410	111	27.07%
2013	Resident	1	207	71	34.30%
2013	Resident	2	89	46	51.69%
2013	Resident	3	28	14	50.00%
2013	Resident	4	4	3	75.00%
2013	Resident	not stated	371	77	20.75%
2013	Resident landowner	0	2	2	100.00%
2013	Resident landowner	1	2	2	100.00%
2013	Resident landowner	not stated	10	10	100.00%
2012	Nonresident	0	26	3	11.54%
2012	Nonresident	1	11	4	36.36%
2012	Nonresident	2	6	4	66.67%
2012	Nonresident	3	1	1	100.00%
2012	Nonresident	not stated	23	11	47.83%
2012	Resident	0	407	108	26.54%
2012	Resident	1	267	131	49.06%
2012	Resident	2	82	52	63.41%
2012	Resident	3	26	22	84.62%
2012	Resident	4	2	2	100.00%
2012	Resident	not stated	415	101	24.34%
2012	Resident landowner	0	5	5	100.00%
2012	Resident landowner	not stated	6	6	100.00%
2011	Nonresident	0	26	8	30.77%
2011	Nonresident	1	11	6	54.55%
2011	Nonresident	2	5	5	100.00%
2011	Nonresident	not stated	22	3	13.64%
2011	Resident	0	467	136	29.12%
2011	Resident	1	210	103	49.05%
2011	Resident	2	64	29	45.31%
2011	Resident	3	16	15	93.75%
2011	Resident	4	5	4	80.00%
2011	Resident	not stated	426	126	29.58%
2011	Resident landowner	0	6	6	100.00%
2011	Resident landowner	3	1	1	100.00%
2011	Resident landowner	not stated	7	7	100.00%
2010	Nonresident	0	41	12	29.27%
2010	Nonresident	1	8	2	25.00%
2010	Nonresident	2	3	2	66.67%
2010	Nonresident	not stated	33	8	24.24%
2010	Resident	0	386	143	37.05%
2010	Resident	1	183	93	50.82%
2010	Resident	2	50	33	66.00%
2010	Resident	3	18	13	72.22%
2010	Resident	4	1	1	100.00%
2010	Resident	not stated	419	127	30.31%
2010	Resident landowner	0	4	4	100.00%
2010	Resident landowner	not stated	12	12	100.00%
2009	Nonresident	0	25	9	36.00%
2009	Nonresident	1	9	5	55.56%
2009	Nonresident	2	1	0	0.00%
2009	Nonresident	not stated	19	3	15.79%
2009	Resident	0	442	163	36.88%
2009	Resident	1	172	107	62.21%
2009	Resident	2	62	36	58.06%
2009	Resident	3	9	8	88.89%
2009	Resident	4	1	1	100.00%
2009	Resident	not stated	327	108	33.03%
2009	Nonresident landowner	not stated	1	1	100.00%
2009	Resident landowner	0	5	5	100.00%
2009	Resident landowner	1	1	1	100.00%
2009	Resident landowner	not stated	3	3	100.00%
2008	Nonresident	0	21	9	42.86%
2008	Nonresident	1	11	8	72.73%
2008	Nonresident	not stated	18	2	11.11%
2008	Resident	0	392	150	38.27%
2008	Resident	1	177	103	58.19%
2008	Resident	2	48	32	66.67%
2008	Resident	3	3	2	66.67%
2008	Resident	not stated	351	129	36.75%
2008	Nonresident landowner	0	1	1	100.00%
2008	Resident landowner	0	3	3	100.00%
2008	Resident landowner	not stated	11	11	100.00%
2007	Nonresident	0	27	9	33.33%
2007	Nonresident	1	4	2	50.00%
2007	Nonresident	not stated	26	11	42.31%
2007	Resident	0	422	159	37.68%
2007	Resident	1	155	86	55.48%
2007	Resident	2	44	37	84.09%
2007	Resident	3	5	4	80.00%
2007	Resident	4	3	3	100.00%
2007	Resident	not stated	354	126	35.59%
2007	Resident landowner	0	3	3	100.00%
2007	Resident landowner	1	1	1	100.00%
2007	Resident landowner	not stated	9	9	100.00%
2006	Nonresident	0	28	7	25.00%
2006	Nonresident	1	5	5	100.00%
2006	Nonresident	not stated	34	14	41.18%
2006	Resident	0	361	153	42.38%
2006	Resident	1	160	95	59.38%
2006	Resident	2	24	22	91.67%
2006	Resident	3	7	6	85.71%
2006	Resident	not stated	340	139	40.88%
2006	Resident landowner	0	3	3	100.00%
2006	Resident landowner	not stated	6	6	100.00%

No bonus point level guarantees a licence in Montana, and this page does not publish one. FWP squares your bonus points and adds them to your current application as extra chances — three points give ten chances, ten points give a hundred and one — so the drawing is a weighted lottery and not a queue. More points is better odds every time, and a place in line never.

Not stated is FWP's own blank cell, and it is not the same as nought. The department's reports frequently carry both a nought-point row and a blank one for the same pool in the same year, with different application counts, and both are inside the district total it prints. FWP does not say what separates them, so they are shown apart rather than added together into a "no points" figure it never published.

Sources for this licence

2013 antelope stats.pdf — Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks, dated 2013-07-16, fetched 2026-09-03
2012 antelope stats.pdf — Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks, dated 2012-07-20, fetched 2026-09-03
2011 antelope stats.pdf — Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks, dated 2011-07-20, fetched 2026-09-03
2010 antelope stats.pdf — Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks, dated 2010-07-21, fetched 2026-09-03
2009 antelope stats.pdf — Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks, dated 2009-07-22, fetched 2026-09-03
2008 ANTELOPE_stats.pdf — Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks, dated 2008-07-28, fetched 2026-09-03
2007 ANTELOPE_stats.pdf — Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks, dated 2007-08-06, fetched 2026-09-03
2006 ANTELOPE_stats.pdf — Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks, dated 2006-08-07, fetched 2026-09-03
2013 dea detailed bonus point stats.xlsx — Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks, dated 2013-08-12, fetched 2026-09-03
2012 dea detailed stats1.pdf — Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks, dated 2012-10-26, fetched 2026-09-03
2011 dea detailed statistics.xls — Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks, dated 2011-08-09, fetched 2026-09-03
2010 dea detailed statistics.xls — Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks, dated 2010-07-23, fetched 2026-09-03
2009 dea detailed statistics.xls — Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks, dated 2009-07-23, fetched 2026-09-03
2008 dea detailed statistics.xls — Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks, dated 2008-07-31, fetched 2026-09-03
2007 dea detailed statistics.xls — Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks, dated 2007-10-30, fetched 2026-09-03
2006 dea detailed statistics.xls — Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks, dated 2006-09-11, fetched 2026-09-03

Other licences in these districts

Antelope licence 311-00 Antelope licence 311-20 Antelope licence 313-20 Antelope licence 317-20 Antelope licence 318-20 Antelope licence 319-00 Antelope licence 319-20 Antelope licence 320-00 Antelope B licence 318-10 Antelope B licence 318-30 All Montana antelope All Montana species

Bonus points are one of Montana's two point systems and the only one that applies here. The other, preference points, exists on nonresident combination licences alone and works in the opposite way. See how these numbers are produced and checked, or the Montana application deadlines.