Montana · Antelope · District 690

Montana antelope licence 690-00

How many people put this antelope licencefirst and how many of them drew it — year by year, separately for each of the four pools Montana draws, and separately at every bonus point level. Every figure comes from a Fish, Wildlife & Parks report linked at the foot of this page.

What the 2013 drawing did

Montana set a quota of 500 on 690-00 in 2013 and drew 499, so 1 went undrawn. Across the four pools FWP draws separately, 3 nonresident landowner applicants put it first and 3 drew, 100.00%; 38 resident landowner applicants put it first and 38 drew, 100.00%; 125 nonresident applicants put it first and 31 drew, 24.80%; 1,312 resident applicants put it first and 427 drew, 32.55%.

This licence code stops appearing after 2013. FWP's 2026 reports do not carry it, and this site does not map a retired code onto a current one — the department renumbered its licence-type suffixes and has published nothing saying which old code became which new one. What is below is the record of the 8 years it was drawn.

Drawing pool

First-choice success rate, by pool and year

The rate is the first-choice applicants in a pool who drew, divided by the first-choice applicants in that pool. Both are exact integers FWP printed in the same row, and it is the measure the department's own drawing statistics tool publishes: "the percentage of 1st choice applicants that were successful". A dash means nobody in that pool applied, so the draw answered nothing — absent, not nought.
Year	Pool	Pool cap	Put it first	Drew on first choice	First-choice success rate	Put it 2nd or 3rd	Drew on 2nd or 3rd
2013	Nonresident	50	125	31	24.80%	70	0
2013	Resident	500	1,312	427	32.55%	449	0
2013	Nonresident landowner	50	3	3	100.00%	—	—
2013	Resident landowner	75	38	38	100.00%	—	—
2012	Nonresident	50	152	46	30.26%	74	0
2012	Resident	500	1,314	409	31.13%	492	0
2012	Nonresident landowner	50	2	2	100.00%	—	—
2012	Resident landowner	75	43	43	100.00%	—	—
2011	Nonresident	70	197	65	32.99%	85	0
2011	Resident	700	1,473	588	39.92%	724	0
2011	Nonresident landowner	70	1	1	100.00%	—	—
2011	Resident landowner	105	46	46	100.00%	—	—
2010	Nonresident	100	188	98	52.13%	120	0
2010	Resident	1,000	1,442	859	59.57%	611	0
2010	Nonresident landowner	100	1	1	100.00%	—	—
2010	Resident landowner	150	42	42	100.00%	—	—
2009	Nonresident	100	182	96	52.75%	109	0
2009	Resident	1,000	1,426	861	60.38%	519	0
2009	Nonresident landowner	100	1	1	100.00%	—	—
2009	Resident landowner	150	42	42	100.00%	—	—
2008	Nonresident	100	182	91	50.00%	82	0
2008	Resident	1,000	1,289	867	67.26%	429	0
2008	Nonresident landowner	100	2	2	100.00%	—	—
2008	Resident landowner	150	40	40	100.00%	—	—
2007	Nonresident	100	171	92	53.80%	119	0
2007	Resident	1,000	1,256	860	68.47%	386	0
2007	Nonresident landowner	100	1	1	100.00%	—	—
2007	Resident landowner	150	46	46	100.00%	—	—
2006	Nonresident	100	179	95	53.07%	116	0
2006	Resident	1,000	1,264	869	68.75%	413	0
2006	Nonresident landowner	100	0	0	—	—	—
2006	Resident landowner	150	35	35	100.00%	—	—

Pool cap is FWP's own QTA column, and it is a ceiling rather than an allocation. The resident regular cap equals the overall quota; the nonresident caps are ten per cent of it and cover landowner and regular nonresidents together; the resident landowner cap is fifteen per cent. The department states plainly that the ceiling is not a floor: "although the nonresident quotas are set at 10%, that entire quota may not be drawn by nonresidents", and that if every resident applicant draws, nonresidents may go over ten per cent.

Landowner rows are a different drawing, not a subset of the one below them.Landowner preference is the first stage, worth up to fifteen per cent of the quota to resident landowners, and its applicants are counted apart from the regular pool throughout. FWP publishes the landowner pools at first choice only, which is why their second and third columns are dashes rather than noughts.

Draw rate at each bonus point level

One row per bonus point level per pool per year, exactly as FWP's Detailed Bonus Point report publishes it. The rate is that level's successes divided by its applications — both exact integers in the same printed row.
Year	Pool	Bonus points	Applied	Drew	Drew at this level
2013	Nonresident	0	36	13	36.11%
2013	Nonresident	1	13	3	23.08%
2013	Nonresident	2	14	8	57.14%
2013	Nonresident	3	1	1	100.00%
2013	Nonresident	not stated	61	6	9.84%
2013	Resident	0	441	125	28.34%
2013	Resident	1	236	109	46.19%
2013	Resident	2	105	53	50.48%
2013	Resident	3	15	10	66.67%
2013	Resident	4	3	3	100.00%
2013	Resident	5	3	3	100.00%
2013	Resident	not stated	510	125	24.51%
2013	Nonresident landowner	not stated	3	3	100.00%
2013	Resident landowner	0	10	10	100.00%
2013	Resident landowner	1	4	4	100.00%
2013	Resident landowner	2	1	1	100.00%
2013	Resident landowner	not stated	23	23	100.00%
2012	Nonresident	0	54	21	38.89%
2012	Nonresident	1	21	5	23.81%
2012	Nonresident	2	6	6	100.00%
2012	Nonresident	3	1	1	100.00%
2012	Nonresident	not stated	70	13	18.57%
2012	Resident	0	459	121	26.36%
2012	Resident	1	276	119	43.12%
2012	Resident	2	57	38	66.67%
2012	Resident	3	8	4	50.00%
2012	Resident	4	7	5	71.43%
2012	Resident	not stated	507	122	24.06%
2012	Nonresident landowner	1	1	1	100.00%
2012	Nonresident landowner	not stated	1	1	100.00%
2012	Resident landowner	0	14	14	100.00%
2012	Resident landowner	1	1	1	100.00%
2012	Resident landowner	not stated	28	28	100.00%
2011	Nonresident	0	70	20	28.57%
2011	Nonresident	1	19	10	52.63%
2011	Nonresident	2	1	1	100.00%
2011	Nonresident	not stated	107	34	31.78%
2011	Resident	0	575	208	36.17%
2011	Resident	1	196	130	66.33%
2011	Resident	2	39	31	79.49%
2011	Resident	3	12	9	75.00%
2011	Resident	4	2	2	100.00%
2011	Resident	not stated	649	208	32.05%
2011	Nonresident landowner	not stated	1	1	100.00%
2011	Resident landowner	0	8	8	100.00%
2011	Resident landowner	2	1	1	100.00%
2011	Resident landowner	not stated	37	37	100.00%
2010	Nonresident	0	64	32	50.00%
2010	Nonresident	1	17	16	94.12%
2010	Nonresident	2	4	4	100.00%
2010	Nonresident	not stated	103	46	44.66%
2010	Resident	0	504	287	56.94%
2010	Resident	1	143	111	77.62%
2010	Resident	2	31	28	90.32%
2010	Resident	3	6	6	100.00%
2010	Resident	4	2	2	100.00%
2010	Resident	not stated	756	425	56.22%
2010	Nonresident landowner	not stated	1	1	100.00%
2010	Resident landowner	0	12	12	100.00%
2010	Resident landowner	1	1	1	100.00%
2010	Resident landowner	not stated	29	29	100.00%
2009	Nonresident	0	58	21	36.21%
2009	Nonresident	1	19	18	94.74%
2009	Nonresident	2	2	2	100.00%
2009	Nonresident	not stated	103	55	53.40%
2009	Resident	0	557	330	59.25%
2009	Resident	1	152	122	80.26%
2009	Resident	2	24	23	95.83%
2009	Resident	3	3	3	100.00%
2009	Resident	not stated	690	383	55.51%
2009	Nonresident landowner	not stated	1	1	100.00%
2009	Resident landowner	0	15	15	100.00%
2009	Resident landowner	1	2	2	100.00%
2009	Resident landowner	2	1	1	100.00%
2009	Resident landowner	not stated	24	24	100.00%
2008	Nonresident	0	70	35	50.00%
2008	Nonresident	1	12	10	83.33%
2008	Nonresident	2	4	4	100.00%
2008	Nonresident	not stated	96	42	43.75%
2008	Resident	0	479	307	64.09%
2008	Resident	1	135	110	81.48%
2008	Resident	2	17	15	88.24%
2008	Resident	3	3	3	100.00%
2008	Resident	not stated	655	432	65.95%
2008	Nonresident landowner	0	1	1	100.00%
2008	Nonresident landowner	not stated	1	1	100.00%
2008	Resident landowner	0	12	12	100.00%
2008	Resident landowner	not stated	28	28	100.00%
2007	Nonresident	0	61	35	57.38%
2007	Nonresident	1	18	13	72.22%
2007	Nonresident	3	1	1	100.00%
2007	Nonresident	not stated	91	43	47.25%
2007	Resident	0	519	343	66.09%
2007	Resident	1	123	115	93.50%
2007	Resident	2	13	12	92.31%
2007	Resident	3	4	4	100.00%
2007	Resident	not stated	598	387	64.72%
2007	Nonresident landowner	not stated	1	1	100.00%
2007	Resident landowner	0	14	14	100.00%
2007	Resident landowner	1	2	2	100.00%
2007	Resident landowner	not stated	30	30	100.00%
2006	Nonresident	0	70	31	44.29%
2006	Nonresident	1	12	11	91.67%
2006	Nonresident	2	1	0	0.00%
2006	Nonresident	not stated	96	53	55.21%
2006	Resident	0	469	299	63.75%
2006	Resident	1	138	125	90.58%
2006	Resident	2	32	32	100.00%
2006	Resident	3	6	6	100.00%
2006	Resident	not stated	620	408	65.81%
2006	Resident landowner	0	11	11	100.00%
2006	Resident landowner	not stated	24	24	100.00%

No bonus point level guarantees a licence in Montana, and this page does not publish one. FWP squares your bonus points and adds them to your current application as extra chances — three points give ten chances, ten points give a hundred and one — so the drawing is a weighted lottery and not a queue. More points is better odds every time, and a place in line never.

Not stated is FWP's own blank cell, and it is not the same as nought. The department's reports frequently carry both a nought-point row and a blank one for the same pool in the same year, with different application counts, and both are inside the district total it prints. FWP does not say what separates them, so they are shown apart rather than added together into a "no points" figure it never published.

Sources for this licence

2013 antelope stats.pdf — Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks, dated 2013-07-16, fetched 2026-09-03
2012 antelope stats.pdf — Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks, dated 2012-07-20, fetched 2026-09-03
2011 antelope stats.pdf — Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks, dated 2011-07-20, fetched 2026-09-03
2010 antelope stats.pdf — Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks, dated 2010-07-21, fetched 2026-09-03
2009 antelope stats.pdf — Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks, dated 2009-07-22, fetched 2026-09-03
2008 ANTELOPE_stats.pdf — Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks, dated 2008-07-28, fetched 2026-09-03
2007 ANTELOPE_stats.pdf — Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks, dated 2007-08-06, fetched 2026-09-03
2006 ANTELOPE_stats.pdf — Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks, dated 2006-08-07, fetched 2026-09-03
2013 dea detailed bonus point stats.xlsx — Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks, dated 2013-08-12, fetched 2026-09-03
2012 dea detailed stats1.pdf — Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks, dated 2012-10-26, fetched 2026-09-03
2011 dea detailed statistics.xls — Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks, dated 2011-08-09, fetched 2026-09-03
2010 dea detailed statistics.xls — Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks, dated 2010-07-23, fetched 2026-09-03
2009 dea detailed statistics.xls — Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks, dated 2009-07-23, fetched 2026-09-03
2008 dea detailed statistics.xls — Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks, dated 2008-07-31, fetched 2026-09-03
2007 dea detailed statistics.xls — Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks, dated 2007-10-30, fetched 2026-09-03
2006 dea detailed statistics.xls — Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks, dated 2006-09-11, fetched 2026-09-03

Other licences in these districts

Antelope licence 650-20 Antelope licence 670-00 Antelope licence 670-10 Antelope licence 670-20 Antelope licence 690-10 Antelope licence 690-20 Antelope licence 700-00 Antelope licence 700-20 Antelope B licence 690-10 Antelope B licence 690-30 All Montana antelope All Montana species

Bonus points are one of Montana's two point systems and the only one that applies here. The other, preference points, exists on nonresident combination licences alone and works in the opposite way. See how these numbers are produced and checked, or the Montana application deadlines.