Big Game by StateThe public record of western draws

Montana · Deer · District 797

Montana deer b licence 797-00

How many people put this deer b licencefirst and how many of them drew it — year by year, separately for each of the four pools Montana draws, and separately at every bonus point level. Every figure comes from a Fish, Wildlife & Parks report linked at the foot of this page.

What the 2013 drawing did

Montana set a quota of 0 on 797-00 in 2013 and drew 100, so -100 went undrawn. Across the four pools FWP draws separately, 3 nonresident landowner applicants put it first and 3 drew, 100.00%; no resident landowner applicant put it first; 812 nonresident applicants put it first and 97 drew, 11.95%; no resident applicant put it first.

This licence code stops appearing after 2013. FWP's 2026 reports do not carry it, and this site does not map a retired code onto a current one — the department renumbered its licence-type suffixes and has published nothing saying which old code became which new one. What is below is the record of the 8 years it was drawn.

Drawing pool

First-choice success rate, by pool and year

The rate is the first-choice applicants in a pool who drew, divided by the first-choice applicants in that pool. Both are exact integers FWP printed in the same row, and it is the measure the department's own drawing statistics tool publishes: "the percentage of 1st choice applicants that were successful". A dash means nobody in that pool applied, so the draw answered nothing — absent, not nought.
YearPoolPool capPut it firstDrew on first choiceFirst-choice success ratePut it 2nd or 3rdDrew on 2nd or 3rd
2013Nonresident1008129711.95%240
2013Resident000—00
2013Nonresident landowner10033100.00%——
2013Resident landowner000———
2012Nonresident1001,083978.96%180
2012Resident000—00
2012Nonresident landowner10033100.00%——
2012Resident landowner000———
2011Nonresident5001,40449835.47%330
2011Resident000—00
2011Nonresident landowner50022100.00%——
2011Resident landowner000———
2010Nonresident1,0001,59899962.52%290
2010Resident000—00
2010Nonresident landowner10011100.00%——
2010Resident landowner000———
2009Nonresident3,0001,6281,628100.00%2222
2009Resident000—00
2009Nonresident landowner30011100.00%——
2009Resident landowner000———
2008Nonresident3,0001,7271,727100.00%44
2008Resident000—00
2008Nonresident landowner45033100.00%——
2008Resident landowner000———
2006Nonresident3,0001,8531,853100.00%55
2006Resident000—00
2006Nonresident landowner45033100.00%——
2006Resident landowner000———

Pool cap is FWP's own QTA column, and it is a ceiling rather than an allocation. The resident regular cap equals the overall quota; the nonresident caps are ten per cent of it and cover landowner and regular nonresidents together; the resident landowner cap is fifteen per cent. The department states plainly that the ceiling is not a floor: "although the nonresident quotas are set at 10%, that entire quota may not be drawn by nonresidents", and that if every resident applicant draws, nonresidents may go over ten per cent.

Landowner rows are a different drawing, not a subset of the one below them.Landowner preference is the first stage, worth up to fifteen per cent of the quota to resident landowners, and its applicants are counted apart from the regular pool throughout. FWP publishes the landowner pools at first choice only, which is why their second and third columns are dashes rather than noughts.

Draw rate at each bonus point level

One row per bonus point level per pool per year, exactly as FWP's Detailed Bonus Point report publishes it. The rate is that level's successes divided by its applications — both exact integers in the same printed row.
YearPoolBonus pointsAppliedDrewDrew at this level
2013Nonresident010176.93%
2013Nonresident1591118.64%
2013Nonresident214214.29%
2013Nonresident34250.00%
2013Nonresidentnot stated6347511.83%
2013Nonresident landowner011100.00%
2013Nonresident landownernot stated22100.00%
2012Nonresident01601911.88%
2012Nonresident149714.29%
2012Nonresident213430.77%
2012Nonresidentnot stated861677.78%
2012Nonresident landowner011100.00%
2012Nonresident landownernot stated22100.00%
2011Nonresident02148137.85%
2011Nonresident1382257.89%
2011Nonresidentnot stated1,15239534.29%
2011Nonresident landowner111100.00%
2011Nonresident landownernot stated11100.00%
2010Nonresident019610654.08%
2010Nonresidentnot stated1,40289363.69%
2010Nonresident landownernot stated11100.00%
2009Nonresident0200200100.00%
2009Nonresident111100.00%
2009Nonresidentnot stated1,4271,427100.00%
2009Nonresident landownernot stated11100.00%
2008Nonresident0245245100.00%
2008Nonresident133100.00%
2008Nonresidentnot stated1,4791,479100.00%
2008Nonresident landownernot stated33100.00%
2007Nonresident0289289100.00%
2007Nonresident177100.00%
2007Nonresidentnot stated1,4961,496100.00%
2007Nonresident landownernot stated44100.00%
2006Nonresident0344344100.00%
2006Nonresident12828100.00%
2006Nonresidentnot stated1,4811,481100.00%
2006Nonresident landowner011100.00%
2006Nonresident landownernot stated22100.00%

No bonus point level guarantees a licence in Montana, and this page does not publish one. FWP squares your bonus points and adds them to your current application as extra chances — three points give ten chances, ten points give a hundred and one — so the drawing is a weighted lottery and not a queue. More points is better odds every time, and a place in line never.

Not stated is FWP's own blank cell, and it is not the same as nought. The department's reports frequently carry both a nought-point row and a blank one for the same pool in the same year, with different application counts, and both are inside the district total it prints. FWP does not say what separates them, so they are shown apart rather than added together into a "no points" figure it never published.

Sources for this licence

Other licences in these districts

Bonus points are one of Montana's two point systems and the only one that applies here. The other, preference points, exists on nonresident combination licences alone and works in the opposite way. See how these numbers are produced and checked, or the Montana application deadlines.