Big Game by StateThe public record of western draws

Montana · Elk · District 302

Montana elk permit 302-50

How many people put this elk permitfirst and how many of them drew it — year by year, separately for each of the four pools Montana draws, and separately at every bonus point level. Every figure comes from a Fish, Wildlife & Parks report linked at the foot of this page.

What the 2013 drawing did

FWP drew 302-50 without a limit in 2013 and issued 1,206 licences. Across the four pools FWP draws separately, no nonresident landowner applicant put it first; no resident landowner applicant put it first; 150 nonresident applicants put it first and 150 drew, 100.00%; 336 resident applicants put it first and 336 drew, 100.00%.

This licence code stops appearing after 2013. FWP's 2026 reports do not carry it, and this site does not map a retired code onto a current one — the department renumbered its licence-type suffixes and has published nothing saying which old code became which new one. What is below is the record of the 4 years it was drawn.

Drawing pool

First-choice success rate, by pool and year

The rate is the first-choice applicants in a pool who drew, divided by the first-choice applicants in that pool. Both are exact integers FWP printed in the same row, and it is the measure the department's own drawing statistics tool publishes: "the percentage of 1st choice applicants that were successful". A dash means nobody in that pool applied, so the draw answered nothing — absent, not nought.
YearPoolPool capPut it firstDrew on first choiceFirst-choice success ratePut it 2nd or 3rdDrew on 2nd or 3rd
2013Nonresidentno limit150150100.00%7171
2013Residentno limit336336100.00%649649
2013Nonresident landownerno limit00———
2013Resident landownerno limit00———
2012Nonresidentno limit206206100.00%7070
2012Residentno limit354354100.00%561561
2012Nonresident landownerno limit00———
2012Resident landownerno limit00———
2011Nonresidentno limit120120100.00%3434
2011Residentno limit367367100.00%347347
2011Nonresident landownerno limit00———
2011Resident landownerno limit00———
2010Nonresidentno limit143143100.00%2424
2010Residentno limit226226100.00%188188
2010Nonresident landownerno limit00———
2010Resident landownerno limit00———

Pool cap is FWP's own QTA column, and it is a ceiling rather than an allocation. The resident regular cap equals the overall quota; the nonresident caps are ten per cent of it and cover landowner and regular nonresidents together; the resident landowner cap is fifteen per cent. The department states plainly that the ceiling is not a floor: "although the nonresident quotas are set at 10%, that entire quota may not be drawn by nonresidents", and that if every resident applicant draws, nonresidents may go over ten per cent.

Landowner rows are a different drawing, not a subset of the one below them.Landowner preference is the first stage, worth up to fifteen per cent of the quota to resident landowners, and its applicants are counted apart from the regular pool throughout. FWP publishes the landowner pools at first choice only, which is why their second and third columns are dashes rather than noughts.

Draw rate at each bonus point level

One row per bonus point level per pool per year, exactly as FWP's Detailed Bonus Point report publishes it. The rate is that level's successes divided by its applications — both exact integers in the same printed row.
YearPoolBonus pointsAppliedDrewDrew at this level
2013Nonresident01515100.00%
2013Nonresident222100.00%
2013Nonresidentnot stated133133100.00%
2013Resident08787100.00%
2013Resident199100.00%
2013Resident211100.00%
2013Resident311100.00%
2013Resident511100.00%
2013Resident611100.00%
2013Resident711100.00%
2013Residentnot stated235235100.00%
2012Nonresident02727100.00%
2012Nonresidentnot stated179179100.00%
2012Resident0103103100.00%
2012Resident11212100.00%
2012Resident244100.00%
2012Resident355100.00%
2012Resident455100.00%
2012Resident811100.00%
2012Residentnot stated224224100.00%
2011Nonresident01515100.00%
2011Nonresident122100.00%
2011Nonresident222100.00%
2011Nonresident311100.00%
2011Nonresident511100.00%
2011Nonresidentnot stated9999100.00%
2011Resident09595100.00%
2011Resident11111100.00%
2011Resident21212100.00%
2011Resident355100.00%
2011Resident444100.00%
2011Resident544100.00%
2011Resident611100.00%
2011Residentnot stated235235100.00%
2010Nonresident02424100.00%
2010Nonresident144100.00%
2010Nonresident222100.00%
2010Nonresidentnot stated113113100.00%
2010Resident05252100.00%
2010Resident166100.00%
2010Resident21111100.00%
2010Resident322100.00%
2010Resident511100.00%
2010Resident611100.00%
2010Residentnot stated153153100.00%

No bonus point level guarantees a licence in Montana, and this page does not publish one. FWP squares your bonus points and adds them to your current application as extra chances — three points give ten chances, ten points give a hundred and one — so the drawing is a weighted lottery and not a queue. More points is better odds every time, and a place in line never.

Not stated is FWP's own blank cell, and it is not the same as nought. The department's reports frequently carry both a nought-point row and a blank one for the same pool in the same year, with different application counts, and both are inside the district total it prints. FWP does not say what separates them, so they are shown apart rather than added together into a "no points" figure it never published.

No limit is a district FWP drew without a quota. Its reports print a sentinel in the quota column for these and footnote their own totals to exclude them, so no quota is shown rather than the sentinel's digits.

Sources for this licence

Other licences in these districts

Bonus points are one of Montana's two point systems and the only one that applies here. The other, preference points, exists on nonresident combination licences alone and works in the opposite way. See how these numbers are produced and checked, or the Montana application deadlines.