Montana · Antelope · District 600

Montana antelope licence 600-00

How many people put this antelope licencefirst and how many of them drew it — year by year, separately for each of the four pools Montana draws, and separately at every bonus point level. Every figure comes from a Fish, Wildlife & Parks report linked at the foot of this page.

What the 2013 drawing did

Montana set a quota of 100 on 600-00 in 2013 and drew 99, so 1 went undrawn. Across the four pools FWP draws separately, no nonresident landowner applicant put it first; 46 resident landowner applicants put it first and 15 drew, 32.61%; 77 nonresident applicants put it first and 10 drew, 12.99%; 682 resident applicants put it first and 74 drew, 10.85%.

This licence code stops appearing after 2013. FWP's 2026 reports do not carry it, and this site does not map a retired code onto a current one — the department renumbered its licence-type suffixes and has published nothing saying which old code became which new one. What is below is the record of the 8 years it was drawn.

Drawing pool

First-choice success rate, by pool and year

The rate is the first-choice applicants in a pool who drew, divided by the first-choice applicants in that pool. Both are exact integers FWP printed in the same row, and it is the measure the department's own drawing statistics tool publishes: "the percentage of 1st choice applicants that were successful". A dash means nobody in that pool applied, so the draw answered nothing — absent, not nought.
Year	Pool	Pool cap	Put it first	Drew on first choice	First-choice success rate	Put it 2nd or 3rd	Drew on 2nd or 3rd
2013	Nonresident	10	77	10	12.99%	78	0
2013	Resident	100	682	74	10.85%	614	0
2013	Nonresident landowner	10	0	0	—	—	—
2013	Resident landowner	15	46	15	32.61%	—	—
2012	Nonresident	10	110	7	6.36%	66	0
2012	Resident	100	896	78	8.71%	535	0
2012	Nonresident landowner	10	1	0	0.00%	—	—
2012	Resident landowner	15	46	15	32.61%	—	—
2011	Nonresident	30	163	23	14.11%	88	0
2011	Resident	300	1,396	232	16.62%	684	0
2011	Nonresident landowner	30	1	1	100.00%	—	—
2011	Resident landowner	45	67	44	65.67%	—	—
2010	Nonresident	70	195	60	30.77%	118	0
2010	Resident	700	1,715	556	32.42%	542	0
2010	Nonresident landowner	70	1	1	100.00%	—	—
2010	Resident landowner	105	83	83	100.00%	—	—
2009	Nonresident	70	226	54	23.89%	108	0
2009	Resident	700	1,723	560	32.50%	438	0
2009	Nonresident landowner	70	3	3	100.00%	—	—
2009	Resident landowner	105	83	83	100.00%	—	—
2008	Nonresident	90	210	87	41.43%	117	0
2008	Resident	900	1,685	735	43.62%	341	0
2008	Nonresident landowner	90	1	1	100.00%	—	—
2008	Resident landowner	135	77	77	100.00%	—	—
2007	Nonresident	90	203	82	40.39%	60	0
2007	Resident	900	1,644	743	45.19%	315	0
2007	Nonresident landowner	90	0	0	—	—	—
2007	Resident landowner	135	74	74	100.00%	—	—
2006	Nonresident	90	220	85	38.64%	61	0
2006	Resident	900	1,623	732	45.10%	339	0
2006	Nonresident landowner	90	3	3	100.00%	—	—
2006	Resident landowner	135	79	79	100.00%	—	—

Pool cap is FWP's own QTA column, and it is a ceiling rather than an allocation. The resident regular cap equals the overall quota; the nonresident caps are ten per cent of it and cover landowner and regular nonresidents together; the resident landowner cap is fifteen per cent. The department states plainly that the ceiling is not a floor: "although the nonresident quotas are set at 10%, that entire quota may not be drawn by nonresidents", and that if every resident applicant draws, nonresidents may go over ten per cent.

Landowner rows are a different drawing, not a subset of the one below them.Landowner preference is the first stage, worth up to fifteen per cent of the quota to resident landowners, and its applicants are counted apart from the regular pool throughout. FWP publishes the landowner pools at first choice only, which is why their second and third columns are dashes rather than noughts.

Draw rate at each bonus point level

One row per bonus point level per pool per year, exactly as FWP's Detailed Bonus Point report publishes it. The rate is that level's successes divided by its applications — both exact integers in the same printed row.
Year	Pool	Bonus points	Applied	Drew	Drew at this level
2013	Nonresident	0	14	0	0.00%
2013	Nonresident	1	19	0	0.00%
2013	Nonresident	2	7	2	28.57%
2013	Nonresident	3	5	4	80.00%
2013	Nonresident	4	4	3	75.00%
2013	Nonresident	not stated	28	1	3.57%
2013	Resident	0	165	13	7.88%
2013	Resident	1	115	16	13.91%
2013	Resident	2	82	14	17.07%
2013	Resident	3	48	10	20.83%
2013	Resident	4	23	9	39.13%
2013	Resident	5	2	1	50.00%
2013	Resident	not stated	217	12	5.53%
2013	Resident landowner	0	12	2	16.67%
2013	Resident landowner	1	2	1	50.00%
2013	Resident landowner	2	3	3	100.00%
2013	Resident landowner	not stated	29	9	31.03%
2012	Nonresident	0	35	4	11.43%
2012	Nonresident	1	22	2	9.09%
2012	Nonresident	2	11	0	0.00%
2012	Nonresident	3	3	1	33.33%
2012	Nonresident	4	1	0	0.00%
2012	Nonresident	not stated	37	0	0.00%
2012	Resident	0	236	7	2.97%
2012	Resident	1	181	22	12.15%
2012	Resident	2	94	19	20.21%
2012	Resident	3	49	16	32.65%
2012	Resident	4	3	0	0.00%
2012	Resident	5	3	2	66.67%
2012	Resident	not stated	299	12	4.01%
2012	Nonresident landowner	not stated	1	0	0.00%
2012	Resident landowner	0	8	4	50.00%
2012	Resident landowner	1	5	2	40.00%
2012	Resident landowner	not stated	33	9	27.27%
2011	Nonresident	0	63	10	15.87%
2011	Nonresident	1	17	0	0.00%
2011	Nonresident	2	9	5	55.56%
2011	Nonresident	3	7	4	57.14%
2011	Nonresident	not stated	67	4	5.97%
2011	Resident	0	517	61	11.80%
2011	Resident	1	244	64	26.23%
2011	Resident	2	113	30	26.55%
2011	Resident	3	21	7	33.33%
2011	Resident	4	7	4	57.14%
2011	Resident	6	1	1	100.00%
2011	Resident	not stated	470	65	13.83%
2011	Nonresident landowner	1	1	1	100.00%
2011	Resident landowner	0	18	12	66.67%
2011	Resident landowner	not stated	49	32	65.31%
2010	Nonresident	0	54	19	35.19%
2010	Nonresident	1	33	11	33.33%
2010	Nonresident	2	16	10	62.50%
2010	Nonresident	3	1	1	100.00%
2010	Nonresident	5	1	0	0.00%
2010	Nonresident	not stated	90	19	21.11%
2010	Resident	0	573	174	30.37%
2010	Resident	1	302	137	45.36%
2010	Resident	2	93	51	54.84%
2010	Resident	3	17	7	41.18%
2010	Resident	4	6	6	100.00%
2010	Resident	5	1	1	100.00%
2010	Resident	not stated	723	180	24.90%
2010	Nonresident landowner	not stated	1	1	100.00%
2010	Resident landowner	0	14	14	100.00%
2010	Resident landowner	1	3	3	100.00%
2010	Resident landowner	2	1	1	100.00%
2010	Resident landowner	not stated	65	65	100.00%
2009	Nonresident	0	85	13	15.29%
2009	Nonresident	1	28	2	7.14%
2009	Nonresident	2	3	2	66.67%
2009	Nonresident	3	1	0	0.00%
2009	Nonresident	4	1	0	0.00%
2009	Nonresident	not stated	108	37	34.26%
2009	Resident	0	681	183	26.87%
2009	Resident	1	288	129	44.79%
2009	Resident	2	74	49	66.22%
2009	Resident	3	29	17	58.62%
2009	Resident	4	3	3	100.00%
2009	Resident	not stated	648	179	27.62%
2009	Nonresident landowner	not stated	3	3	100.00%
2009	Resident landowner	0	17	17	100.00%
2009	Resident landowner	1	5	5	100.00%
2009	Resident landowner	not stated	61	61	100.00%
2008	Nonresident	0	93	29	31.18%
2008	Nonresident	1	22	17	77.27%
2008	Nonresident	2	10	9	90.00%
2008	Nonresident	3	2	1	50.00%
2008	Nonresident	not stated	83	31	37.35%
2008	Resident	0	677	274	40.47%
2008	Resident	1	239	148	61.92%
2008	Resident	2	85	54	63.53%
2008	Resident	3	15	12	80.00%
2008	Resident	4	3	3	100.00%
2008	Resident	not stated	666	244	36.64%
2008	Nonresident landowner	0	1	1	100.00%
2008	Resident landowner	0	20	20	100.00%
2008	Resident landowner	1	4	4	100.00%
2008	Resident landowner	not stated	53	53	100.00%
2007	Nonresident	0	73	24	32.88%
2007	Nonresident	1	25	13	52.00%
2007	Nonresident	2	9	6	66.67%
2007	Nonresident	not stated	96	39	40.63%
2007	Resident	0	629	269	42.77%
2007	Resident	1	256	161	62.89%
2007	Resident	2	60	44	73.33%
2007	Resident	3	18	15	83.33%
2007	Resident	4	6	6	100.00%
2007	Resident	not stated	676	249	36.83%
2007	Resident landowner	0	16	16	100.00%
2007	Resident landowner	1	1	1	100.00%
2007	Resident landowner	2	1	1	100.00%
2007	Resident landowner	not stated	56	56	100.00%
2006	Nonresident	0	67	25	37.31%
2006	Nonresident	1	26	16	61.54%
2006	Nonresident	2	3	3	100.00%
2006	Nonresident	not stated	124	41	33.06%
2006	Resident	0	620	254	40.97%
2006	Resident	1	222	147	66.22%
2006	Resident	2	74	54	72.97%
2006	Resident	3	22	16	72.73%
2006	Resident	not stated	686	262	38.19%
2006	Nonresident landowner	not stated	3	3	100.00%
2006	Resident landowner	0	17	17	100.00%
2006	Resident landowner	1	2	2	100.00%
2006	Resident landowner	2	2	2	100.00%
2006	Resident landowner	not stated	58	58	100.00%

No bonus point level guarantees a licence in Montana, and this page does not publish one. FWP squares your bonus points and adds them to your current application as extra chances — three points give ten chances, ten points give a hundred and one — so the drawing is a weighted lottery and not a queue. More points is better odds every time, and a place in line never.

Not stated is FWP's own blank cell, and it is not the same as nought. The department's reports frequently carry both a nought-point row and a blank one for the same pool in the same year, with different application counts, and both are inside the district total it prints. FWP does not say what separates them, so they are shown apart rather than added together into a "no points" figure it never published.

Sources for this licence

2013 antelope stats.pdf — Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks, dated 2013-07-16, fetched 2026-09-03
2012 antelope stats.pdf — Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks, dated 2012-07-20, fetched 2026-09-03
2011 antelope stats.pdf — Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks, dated 2011-07-20, fetched 2026-09-03
2010 antelope stats.pdf — Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks, dated 2010-07-21, fetched 2026-09-03
2009 antelope stats.pdf — Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks, dated 2009-07-22, fetched 2026-09-03
2008 ANTELOPE_stats.pdf — Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks, dated 2008-07-28, fetched 2026-09-03
2007 ANTELOPE_stats.pdf — Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks, dated 2007-08-06, fetched 2026-09-03
2006 ANTELOPE_stats.pdf — Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks, dated 2006-08-07, fetched 2026-09-03
2013 dea detailed bonus point stats.xlsx — Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks, dated 2013-08-12, fetched 2026-09-03
2012 dea detailed stats1.pdf — Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks, dated 2012-10-26, fetched 2026-09-03
2011 dea detailed statistics.xls — Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks, dated 2011-08-09, fetched 2026-09-03
2010 dea detailed statistics.xls — Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks, dated 2010-07-23, fetched 2026-09-03
2009 dea detailed statistics.xls — Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks, dated 2009-07-23, fetched 2026-09-03
2008 dea detailed statistics.xls — Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks, dated 2008-07-31, fetched 2026-09-03
2007 dea detailed statistics.xls — Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks, dated 2007-10-30, fetched 2026-09-03
2006 dea detailed statistics.xls — Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks, dated 2006-09-11, fetched 2026-09-03

Other licences in these districts

Antelope licence 586-20 Antelope licence 590-00 Antelope licence 590-20 Antelope licence 596-20 Antelope licence 600-10 Antelope licence 600-20 Antelope licence 620-00 Antelope licence 620-10 Antelope B licence 600-10 Antelope B licence 600-30 All Montana antelope All Montana species

Bonus points are one of Montana's two point systems and the only one that applies here. The other, preference points, exists on nonresident combination licences alone and works in the opposite way. See how these numbers are produced and checked, or the Montana application deadlines.