Big Game by StateThe public record of western draws

Idaho · Pronghorn · Hunt 4008

Idaho pronghorn controlled hunt 4008

How many hunters put this controlled hunt first and how many of them drew it — season by season, for both of Idaho's application periods and both residency pools. Every figure comes from an Idaho Fish and Game response linked at the foot of this page.

What the 2026 drawing did

Idaho offered 75 permits on hunt 4008 in 2026 and issued 75 — the hunt filled. In the first application period, 2,981 hunters put it first and 75 drew, 2.52%.

Idaho grants no preference for having applied before. The department is direct about it — "IDFG does not use any point system in our draw process" — and its own published data has never carried a point, preference or bonus field in the twenty-nine seasons it covers. Applying for eleven years earns exactly what applying for the first time earns. There is no points-to-draw figure on this page because there is none to publish, and any site showing you one for Idaho has invented it.

Published in 29 of the 29 seasons Idaho offers, 1998 to 2026.

Application period
Residency

First-choice draw rate, by season

The rate is the hunters awarded this hunt on their first choice, divided by the hunters who named it first. Both are exact integers Idaho Fish and Game returns in the same record. A dash means nobody named it first, so the drawing answered nothing — absent, not nought.
SeasonPeriodAreaPermits availablePut it firstDrew on first choiceFirst-choice draw ratePut it secondDrew on second choicePermits issued
2026Second40137610.27%17901
2026First40752,981752.52%1,306075
2025Second40291420.22%26002
2025First40752,754752.72%1,265075
2024Second40499340.40%30704
2024First40752,456753.05%1,303075
2023Second40147810.21%14601
2023First40752,443753.07%1,219075
2022Second41-191,86390.48%19209
2022First41-12003,6702005.45%1,3030200
2021Second41-151,37650.36%14005
2021First41-12003,7112005.39%1,2240200
2020Second41-151,64450.30%17105
2020First41-12003,9802005.03%1,2550200
2019Second41-1496640.41%13704
2019First41-12004,0062004.99%1,1510200
2018Second41-151,15850.43%10005
2018First41-12003,5302005.67%1,0020200
2017Second41-1121310.47%5601
2017First41-12003,3122006.04%9410200
2016Second44-1221020.95%13302
2016First44-11001,3541007.39%5980100
2015Second44-1441140.97%10704
2015First44-11001,4591006.85%7100100
2014Second44-1*222420.89%5902
2014First44-1*751,150756.52%446075
2013Second44-1*112010.83%1401
2013First44-1*751,055757.11%378075
2012Second44*217421.15%5302
2012First44*50757506.61%319050
2011Second44*217721.13%4602
2011First44*50567508.82%279050
2010First44*35429358.16%220035
2009First44*353293510.64%217035
2008Second44*13013.33%3001
2008First44*353343510.48%224035
2007First44*353273510.70%241035
2006Second44*27022.86%2402
2006First44*504955010.10%237050
2005Second44*313232.27%4903
2005First44*503935012.72%242050
2004Second4416111.64%1701
2004First4450533509.38%268050
2003First422001,89420010.56%9900200
2002First422001,87320010.68%9770200
2001First3920544203.68%228020
2000First37A251282519.53%49025
1999First37A25972525.77%77025
1998First37-1754717515.92%297075

Idaho draws each hunt twice. The first application period is where almost everybody applies; the second is a real second drawing for what is left. They are different competitions and nothing here averages them.

The area label changes across seasons for this hunt number — Idaho printed 40, 41-1, 44-1, 44-1*, 44*, 44, 42, 39, 37A, 37-1. A controlled hunt number is reissued, and the department publishes nothing that settles whether the same number covers the same ground from one season to the next: across all its hunts, 874 of 974 numbers see its own internal area key change and 888 see the printed label change, independently of each other. So each row shows the label Idaho printed for that season and this page asserts nothing about the place.

By residency

Idaho splits both applicants and permits by residency. The applicant counts are first-choice only in every season; the permit counts are not, which is why some rates here are blank.
SeasonPeriodResidencyPut it firstPermitsDraw rateWhat the permit count coversIDFG's own figure
2026SecondResident34410.29%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree0%
2026SecondNonresident3200.00%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree0%
2026FirstResident2,677682.54%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree3%
2026FirstNonresident30472.30%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree2%
2025SecondResident82420.24%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree0%
2025SecondNonresident9000.00%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree0%
2025FirstResident2,492682.73%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree3%
2025FirstNonresident26272.67%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree3%
2024SecondResident90940.44%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree0%
2024SecondNonresident8400.00%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree0%
2024FirstResident2,235693.09%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree3%
2024FirstNonresident22162.71%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree3%
2023SecondResident43810.23%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree0%
2023SecondNonresident4000.00%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree0%
2023FirstResident2,229723.23%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree3%
2023FirstNonresident21431.40%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree1%
2022SecondResident1,71480.47%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree0%
2022SecondNonresident14910.67%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree1%
2022FirstResident3,2551865.71%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree6%
2022FirstNonresident415143.37%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree3%
2021SecondResident1,23550.40%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree0%
2021SecondNonresident14100.00%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree0%
2021FirstResident3,2991805.46%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree5%
2021FirstNonresident412204.85%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree5%
2020SecondResident1,41850.35%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree0%
2020SecondNonresident22600.00%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree0%
2020FirstResident3,5341805.09%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree5%
2020FirstNonresident446204.48%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree4%
2019SecondResident87540.46%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree0%
2019SecondNonresident9100.00%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree0%
2019FirstResident3,5451805.08%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree5%
2019FirstNonresident461204.34%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree4%
2018SecondResident1,03640.39%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree0%
2018SecondNonresident12210.82%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree1%
2018FirstResident3,1231805.76%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree6%
2018FirstNonresident407204.91%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree5%
2017SecondResident19510.51%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree1%
2017SecondNonresident1800.00%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree0%
2017FirstResident3,0201826.03%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree6%
2017FirstNonresident292186.16%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree6%
2016SecondResident19221.04%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree1%
2016SecondNonresident1800.00%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree0%
2016FirstResident1,292957.35%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree7%
2016FirstNonresident6258.06%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree8%
2015SecondResident38441.04%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree1%
2015SecondNonresident2700.00%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree0%
2015FirstResident1,388946.77%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree7%
2015FirstNonresident7168.45%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree8%
2014SecondResident21720.92%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree1%
2014SecondNonresident700.00%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree0%
2014FirstResident1,101746.72%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree7%
2014FirstNonresident4912.04%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree2%
2013SecondResident11310.88%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree1%
2013SecondNonresident700.00%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree0%
2013FirstResident998717.11%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree7%
2013FirstNonresident5747.02%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree7%
2012SecondResident16921.18%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree1%
2012SecondNonresident500.00%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree0%
2012FirstResident723456.22%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree6%
2012FirstNonresident34514.71%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree15%
2011SecondResident17421.15%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree1%
2011SecondNonresident300.00%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree0%
2011FirstResident545468.44%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree8%
2011FirstNonresident22418.18%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree18%
2010FirstResident408358.58%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree9%
2010FirstNonresident2100.00%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree0%
2009FirstResident3143310.51%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree11%
2009FirstNonresident15213.33%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree13%
2008SecondResident2813.57%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree4%
2008SecondNonresident200.00%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree0%
2008FirstResident3223310.25%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree10%
2008FirstNonresident12216.67%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree17%
2007FirstResident3033210.56%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree11%
2007FirstNonresident24312.50%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree12%
2006SecondResident6722.99%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree3%
2006SecondNonresident300.00%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree0%
2006FirstResident4404510.23%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree10%
2006FirstNonresident5559.09%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree9%
2005SecondResident12821.56%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree2%
2005SecondNonresident4125.00%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree25%
2005FirstResident3714812.94%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree13%
2005FirstNonresident2229.09%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree9%
2004SecondResident5611.79%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree1%
2004SecondNonresident500.00%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree0%
2004FirstResident503489.54%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree9%
2004FirstNonresident3026.67%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree6%
2003FirstResident1,77919010.68%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree10%
2003FirstNonresident115108.70%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree8%
2002FirstResident1,74818310.47%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree10%
2002FirstNonresident1251713.60%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree13%
2001FirstResident530193.58%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree3%
2001FirstNonresident1417.14%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree7%
2000FirstResident1182319.49%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree19%
2000FirstNonresident10220.00%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree20%
1999FirstResident942425.53%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree25%
1999FirstNonresident3133.33%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree33%
1998FirstResident4607416.09%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree16%
1998FirstNonresident1119.09%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree9%

Why some residency rates are blank. Idaho changed what its residency permit columns count around the 2019 season without renaming them. Before, they cover both application choices; from 2019, first choice only. The applicant columns are first-choice-only throughout. So on an older row where permits went to second-choice hunters, dividing one by the other counts winners the denominator never counted — on one 1998 deer hunt that arithmetic gives 250%. Rather than publish that, or pick an era and apply it to every row, this site reads which meaning each row's own totals support and leaves the rate empty where the two do not match.

IDFG's own figure is the percentage the department publishes alongside its counts. It is a rounded summary and it disagrees with its own rows: on the 1998 hunt above it reads 100. It is shown because the department publishes it and a reader will meet it elsewhere, not because it answers the question this page is about.

Where Idaho's own figures disagree with each other

  • IDFG printed 10 different area labels for pronghorn hunt 4008 across the seasons it published (37-1, 37A, 39, 40, 41-1, 42, 44, 44*, 44-1, 44-1*). Neither its label nor its internal area key is an identity, so this site shows what the department printed for each season and asserts nothing about whether the ground is the same.

Nothing above is corrected. Correcting it would mean publishing a figure the department never stated.

Sources for this hunt

Nearby hunt numbers

Idaho grants no preference to previously unsuccessful applicants, so nothing on this page accumulates and nothing here predicts next season. See how these numbers are produced and checked, or the Idaho application deadlines.