Big Game by StateThe public record of western draws

Idaho · Pronghorn · Hunt 4009

Idaho pronghorn controlled hunt 4009

How many hunters put this controlled hunt first and how many of them drew it — season by season, for both of Idaho's application periods and both residency pools. Every figure comes from an Idaho Fish and Game response linked at the foot of this page.

What the 2026 drawing did

Idaho offered 200 permits on hunt 4009 in 2026 and issued 200 — the hunt filled. In the first application period, 4,260 hunters put it first and 200 drew, 4.69%.

Idaho grants no preference for having applied before. The department is direct about it — "IDFG does not use any point system in our draw process" — and its own published data has never carried a point, preference or bonus field in the twenty-nine seasons it covers. Applying for eleven years earns exactly what applying for the first time earns. There is no points-to-draw figure on this page because there is none to publish, and any site showing you one for Idaho has invented it.

Published in 29 of the 29 seasons Idaho offers, 1998 to 2026.

Application period
Residency

First-choice draw rate, by season

The rate is the hunters awarded this hunt on their first choice, divided by the hunters who named it first. Both are exact integers Idaho Fish and Game returns in the same record. A dash means nobody named it first, so the drawing answered nothing — absent, not nought.
SeasonPeriodAreaPermits availablePut it firstDrew on first choiceFirst-choice draw ratePut it secondDrew on second choicePermits issued
2026Second41-1102,179100.46%253010
2026First41-12004,2602004.69%1,5410200
2025Second41-1291220.22%30802
2025First41-12004,4782004.47%1,3540200
2024Second41-191,56290.58%28409
2024First41-12004,0782004.90%1,3440200
2023Second41-1282720.24%20902
2023First41-12003,8742005.16%1,3510200
2022Second44-1000—000
2022First44-1751,393755.38%679075
2021Second44-1121110.47%10301
2021First44-1751,309755.73%592075
2020Second44-1122910.44%10801
2020First44-11001,6231006.16%9230100
2019Second44-1115810.63%6901
2019First44-11001,4961006.68%8920100
2018Second44-1232420.62%11502
2018First44-11001,4281007.00%7800100
2017Second44-1347630.63%9903
2017First44-11001,3961007.16%6910100
2016First45-125473255.29%400025
2015Second45-117411.35%4601
2015First45-125394256.35%401025
2014Second45-117911.27%5201
2014First45-115350154.29%348015
2013First45-115320154.69%313015
2012Second45-115711.75%3701
2012First45-115327154.59%280015
2011First45-110282103.55%263010
2010First45-110255103.92%289010
2009First45-110239104.18%209010
2008Second45-1215721.27%5002
2008First45-110272103.68%235010
2007Second45-115211.92%1501
2007First45-110161106.21%205010
2006First4510171105.85%178010
2005Second4516311.59%2001
2005First4510145106.90%193010
2004First4510158106.33%219010
2003First44403794010.55%259040
2002First4440408409.80%261040
2001First401501,24015012.10%9190150
2000First3920584203.42%273020
1999First3910414102.42%176010
1998First37-210065510015.27%3590100

Idaho draws each hunt twice. The first application period is where almost everybody applies; the second is a real second drawing for what is left. They are different competitions and nothing here averages them.

The area label changes across seasons for this hunt number — Idaho printed 41-1, 44-1, 45-1, 45, 44, 40, 39, 37-2. A controlled hunt number is reissued, and the department publishes nothing that settles whether the same number covers the same ground from one season to the next: across all its hunts, 874 of 974 numbers see its own internal area key change and 888 see the printed label change, independently of each other. So each row shows the label Idaho printed for that season and this page asserts nothing about the place.

By residency

Idaho splits both applicants and permits by residency. The applicant counts are first-choice only in every season; the permit counts are not, which is why some rates here are blank.
SeasonPeriodResidencyPut it firstPermitsDraw rateWhat the permit count coversIDFG's own figure
2026SecondResident1,96390.46%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree0%
2026SecondNonresident21610.46%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree0%
2026FirstResident3,6871804.88%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree5%
2026FirstNonresident573203.49%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree3%
2025SecondResident83620.24%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree0%
2025SecondNonresident7600.00%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree0%
2025FirstResident3,9441804.56%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree5%
2025FirstNonresident534203.75%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree4%
2024SecondResident1,41390.64%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree1%
2024SecondNonresident14900.00%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree0%
2024FirstResident3,6061804.99%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree5%
2024FirstNonresident472204.24%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree4%
2023SecondResident74110.13%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree0%
2023SecondNonresident8611.16%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree1%
2023FirstResident3,4301805.25%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree5%
2023FirstNonresident444204.50%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree5%
2022SecondResident00—no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree0%
2022SecondNonresident00—no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree0%
2022FirstResident1,325695.21%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree5%
2022FirstNonresident6868.82%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree9%
2021SecondResident19710.51%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree1%
2021SecondNonresident1400.00%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree0%
2021FirstResident1,240745.97%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree6%
2021FirstNonresident6911.45%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree1%
2020SecondResident20410.49%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree0%
2020SecondNonresident2500.00%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree0%
2020FirstResident1,506936.18%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree6%
2020FirstNonresident11775.98%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree6%
2019SecondResident14710.68%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree1%
2019SecondNonresident1100.00%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree0%
2019FirstResident1,401916.50%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree6%
2019FirstNonresident9599.47%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree9%
2018SecondResident30220.66%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree1%
2018SecondNonresident2200.00%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree0%
2018FirstResident1,326957.16%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree7%
2018FirstNonresident10254.90%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree5%
2017SecondResident43730.69%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree1%
2017SecondNonresident3900.00%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree0%
2017FirstResident1,314927.00%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree7%
2017FirstNonresident8289.76%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree10%
2016FirstResident428245.61%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree6%
2016FirstNonresident4512.22%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree2%
2015SecondResident6511.54%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree2%
2015SecondNonresident900.00%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree0%
2015FirstResident368236.25%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree6%
2015FirstNonresident2627.69%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree8%
2014SecondResident7311.37%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree1%
2014SecondNonresident600.00%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree0%
2014FirstResident323144.33%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree4%
2014FirstNonresident2713.70%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree4%
2013FirstResident298144.70%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree5%
2013FirstNonresident2214.55%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree5%
2012SecondResident5511.82%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree2%
2012SecondNonresident200.00%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree0%
2012FirstResident301144.65%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree5%
2012FirstNonresident2613.85%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree4%
2011FirstResident261103.83%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree4%
2011FirstNonresident2100.00%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree0%
2010FirstResident231104.33%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree4%
2010FirstNonresident2400.00%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree0%
2009FirstResident23093.91%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree4%
2009FirstNonresident9111.11%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree11%
2008SecondResident14821.35%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree1%
2008SecondNonresident900.00%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree0%
2008FirstResident25793.50%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree4%
2008FirstNonresident1516.67%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree7%
2007SecondResident5012.00%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree2%
2007SecondNonresident200.00%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree0%
2007FirstResident155106.45%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree6%
2007FirstNonresident600.00%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree0%
2006FirstResident162106.17%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree6%
2006FirstNonresident900.00%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree0%
2005SecondResident5511.82%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree2%
2005SecondNonresident800.00%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree0%
2005FirstResident139107.19%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree7%
2005FirstNonresident600.00%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree0%
2004FirstResident144106.94%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree6%
2004FirstNonresident1400.00%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree0%
2003FirstResident3703810.27%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree10%
2003FirstNonresident9222.22%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree22%
2002FirstResident3903910.00%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree10%
2002FirstNonresident1815.56%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree5%
2001FirstResident1,20814411.92%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree11%
2001FirstNonresident32618.75%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree18%
2000FirstResident568203.52%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree3%
2000FirstNonresident1600.00%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree0%
1999FirstResident406102.46%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree2%
1999FirstNonresident800.00%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree0%
1998FirstResident6429915.42%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree15%
1998FirstNonresident1317.69%no permits went to second choice, so the two readings agree7%

Why some residency rates are blank. Idaho changed what its residency permit columns count around the 2019 season without renaming them. Before, they cover both application choices; from 2019, first choice only. The applicant columns are first-choice-only throughout. So on an older row where permits went to second-choice hunters, dividing one by the other counts winners the denominator never counted — on one 1998 deer hunt that arithmetic gives 250%. Rather than publish that, or pick an era and apply it to every row, this site reads which meaning each row's own totals support and leaves the rate empty where the two do not match.

IDFG's own figure is the percentage the department publishes alongside its counts. It is a rounded summary and it disagrees with its own rows: on the 1998 hunt above it reads 100. It is shown because the department publishes it and a reader will meet it elsewhere, not because it answers the question this page is about.

Where Idaho's own figures disagree with each other

  • IDFG printed 8 different area labels for pronghorn hunt 4009 across the seasons it published (37-2, 39, 40, 41-1, 44, 44-1, 45, 45-1). Neither its label nor its internal area key is an identity, so this site shows what the department printed for each season and asserts nothing about whether the ground is the same.

Nothing above is corrected. Correcting it would mean publishing a figure the department never stated.

Sources for this hunt

Nearby hunt numbers

Idaho grants no preference to previously unsuccessful applicants, so nothing on this page accumulates and nothing here predicts next season. See how these numbers are produced and checked, or the Idaho application deadlines.