Montana · Antelope · District 530

Montana antelope licence 530-00

How many people put this antelope licencefirst and how many of them drew it — year by year, separately for each of the four pools Montana draws, and separately at every bonus point level. Every figure comes from a Fish, Wildlife & Parks report linked at the foot of this page.

What the 2013 drawing did

Montana set a quota of 300 on 530-00 in 2013 and drew 300 — the quota filled. Across the four pools FWP draws separately, 1 nonresident landowner applicant put it first and 1 drew, 100.00%; 6 resident landowner applicants put it first and 6 drew, 100.00%; 67 nonresident applicants put it first and 29 drew, 43.28%; 444 resident applicants put it first and 264 drew, 59.46%.

This licence code stops appearing after 2013. FWP's 2026 reports do not carry it, and this site does not map a retired code onto a current one — the department renumbered its licence-type suffixes and has published nothing saying which old code became which new one. What is below is the record of the 8 years it was drawn.

Drawing pool

First-choice success rate, by pool and year

The rate is the first-choice applicants in a pool who drew, divided by the first-choice applicants in that pool. Both are exact integers FWP printed in the same row, and it is the measure the department's own drawing statistics tool publishes: "the percentage of 1st choice applicants that were successful". A dash means nobody in that pool applied, so the draw answered nothing — absent, not nought.
Year	Pool	Pool cap	Put it first	Drew on first choice	First-choice success rate	Put it 2nd or 3rd	Drew on 2nd or 3rd
2013	Nonresident	30	67	29	43.28%	31	0
2013	Resident	300	444	264	59.46%	201	0
2013	Nonresident landowner	30	1	1	100.00%	—	—
2013	Resident landowner	45	6	6	100.00%	—	—
2012	Nonresident	30	89	29	32.58%	33	0
2012	Resident	300	487	263	54.00%	227	0
2012	Nonresident landowner	30	1	1	100.00%	—	—
2012	Resident landowner	45	7	7	100.00%	—	—
2011	Nonresident	40	94	40	42.55%	45	0
2011	Resident	400	650	351	54.00%	221	0
2011	Nonresident landowner	40	0	0	—	—	—
2011	Resident landowner	60	9	9	100.00%	—	—
2010	Nonresident	60	156	59	37.82%	46	0
2010	Resident	600	700	529	75.57%	203	0
2010	Nonresident landowner	60	0	0	—	—	—
2010	Resident landowner	90	12	12	100.00%	—	—
2009	Nonresident	70	176	69	39.20%	71	0
2009	Resident	700	736	624	84.78%	228	0
2009	Nonresident landowner	70	0	0	—	—	—
2009	Resident landowner	105	7	7	100.00%	—	—
2008	Nonresident	80	212	80	37.74%	94	0
2008	Resident	800	778	709	91.13%	164	0
2008	Nonresident landowner	80	0	0	—	—	—
2008	Resident landowner	120	11	11	100.00%	—	—
2007	Nonresident	130	236	151	63.98%	85	0
2007	Resident	1,300	1,058	1,058	100.00%	81	80
2007	Nonresident landowner	13	1	1	100.00%	—	—
2007	Resident landowner	195	10	10	100.00%	—	—
2006	Nonresident	150	264	148	56.06%	110	0
2006	Resident	1,500	1,257	1,257	100.00%	95	88
2006	Nonresident landowner	150	0	0	—	—	—
2006	Resident landowner	225	7	7	100.00%	—	—

Pool cap is FWP's own QTA column, and it is a ceiling rather than an allocation. The resident regular cap equals the overall quota; the nonresident caps are ten per cent of it and cover landowner and regular nonresidents together; the resident landowner cap is fifteen per cent. The department states plainly that the ceiling is not a floor: "although the nonresident quotas are set at 10%, that entire quota may not be drawn by nonresidents", and that if every resident applicant draws, nonresidents may go over ten per cent.

Landowner rows are a different drawing, not a subset of the one below them.Landowner preference is the first stage, worth up to fifteen per cent of the quota to resident landowners, and its applicants are counted apart from the regular pool throughout. FWP publishes the landowner pools at first choice only, which is why their second and third columns are dashes rather than noughts.

Draw rate at each bonus point level

One row per bonus point level per pool per year, exactly as FWP's Detailed Bonus Point report publishes it. The rate is that level's successes divided by its applications — both exact integers in the same printed row.
Year	Pool	Bonus points	Applied	Drew	Drew at this level
2013	Nonresident	0	15	5	33.33%
2013	Nonresident	1	15	8	53.33%
2013	Nonresident	2	4	3	75.00%
2013	Nonresident	3	3	2	66.67%
2013	Nonresident	4	1	1	100.00%
2013	Nonresident	6	1	1	100.00%
2013	Nonresident	not stated	28	9	32.14%
2013	Resident	0	181	99	54.70%
2013	Resident	1	57	50	87.72%
2013	Resident	2	14	14	100.00%
2013	Resident	not stated	192	101	52.60%
2013	Nonresident landowner	not stated	1	1	100.00%
2013	Resident landowner	0	2	2	100.00%
2013	Resident landowner	not stated	4	4	100.00%
2012	Nonresident	0	33	6	18.18%
2012	Nonresident	1	8	6	75.00%
2012	Nonresident	2	2	1	50.00%
2012	Nonresident	not stated	46	16	34.78%
2012	Resident	0	163	81	49.69%
2012	Resident	1	70	48	68.57%
2012	Resident	2	10	7	70.00%
2012	Resident	5	1	1	100.00%
2012	Resident	not stated	243	126	51.85%
2012	Nonresident landowner	0	1	1	100.00%
2012	Resident landowner	0	2	2	100.00%
2012	Resident landowner	not stated	5	5	100.00%
2011	Nonresident	0	14	9	64.29%
2011	Nonresident	1	4	3	75.00%
2011	Nonresident	2	2	2	100.00%
2011	Nonresident	4	2	0	0.00%
2011	Nonresident	not stated	72	26	36.11%
2011	Resident	0	226	124	54.87%
2011	Resident	1	48	42	87.50%
2011	Resident	2	4	4	100.00%
2011	Resident	not stated	372	181	48.66%
2011	Resident landowner	0	1	1	100.00%
2011	Resident landowner	not stated	8	8	100.00%
2010	Nonresident	0	39	10	25.64%
2010	Nonresident	1	26	12	46.15%
2010	Nonresident	2	7	5	71.43%
2010	Nonresident	3	2	0	0.00%
2010	Nonresident	not stated	82	32	39.02%
2010	Resident	0	213	160	75.12%
2010	Resident	1	35	31	88.57%
2010	Resident	2	8	8	100.00%
2010	Resident	not stated	444	330	74.32%
2010	Resident landowner	0	1	1	100.00%
2010	Resident landowner	not stated	11	11	100.00%
2009	Nonresident	0	57	18	31.58%
2009	Nonresident	1	14	5	35.71%
2009	Nonresident	2	3	1	33.33%
2009	Nonresident	not stated	102	45	44.12%
2009	Resident	0	233	198	84.98%
2009	Resident	1	28	21	75.00%
2009	Resident	2	2	2	100.00%
2009	Resident	3	1	1	100.00%
2009	Resident	not stated	472	402	85.17%
2009	Resident landowner	0	2	2	100.00%
2009	Resident landowner	not stated	5	5	100.00%
2008	Nonresident	0	75	22	29.33%
2008	Nonresident	1	14	10	71.43%
2008	Nonresident	2	1	1	100.00%
2008	Nonresident	not stated	122	47	38.52%
2008	Resident	0	245	215	87.76%
2008	Resident	1	13	13	100.00%
2008	Resident	2	1	1	100.00%
2008	Resident	not stated	519	480	92.49%
2008	Resident landowner	0	2	2	100.00%
2008	Resident landowner	not stated	9	9	100.00%
2007	Nonresident	0	76	49	64.47%
2007	Nonresident	1	24	20	83.33%
2007	Nonresident	2	4	4	100.00%
2007	Nonresident	not stated	132	78	59.09%
2007	Resident	0	357	357	100.00%
2007	Resident	1	12	12	100.00%
2007	Resident	2	3	3	100.00%
2007	Resident	3	1	1	100.00%
2007	Resident	4	1	1	100.00%
2007	Resident	not stated	684	684	100.00%
2007	Nonresident landowner	0	1	1	100.00%
2007	Resident landowner	0	1	1	100.00%
2007	Resident landowner	not stated	9	9	100.00%
2006	Nonresident	0	94	46	48.94%
2006	Nonresident	1	19	15	78.95%
2006	Nonresident	2	3	3	100.00%
2006	Nonresident	not stated	148	84	56.76%
2006	Resident	0	343	343	100.00%
2006	Resident	1	20	20	100.00%
2006	Resident	2	3	3	100.00%
2006	Resident	3	1	1	100.00%
2006	Resident	not stated	890	890	100.00%
2006	Resident landowner	0	1	1	100.00%
2006	Resident landowner	not stated	6	6	100.00%

No bonus point level guarantees a licence in Montana, and this page does not publish one. FWP squares your bonus points and adds them to your current application as extra chances — three points give ten chances, ten points give a hundred and one — so the drawing is a weighted lottery and not a queue. More points is better odds every time, and a place in line never.

Not stated is FWP's own blank cell, and it is not the same as nought. The department's reports frequently carry both a nought-point row and a blank one for the same pool in the same year, with different application counts, and both are inside the district total it prints. FWP does not say what separates them, so they are shown apart rather than added together into a "no points" figure it never published.

Sources for this licence

2013 antelope stats.pdf — Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks, dated 2013-07-16, fetched 2026-09-03
2012 antelope stats.pdf — Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks, dated 2012-07-20, fetched 2026-09-03
2011 antelope stats.pdf — Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks, dated 2011-07-20, fetched 2026-09-03
2010 antelope stats.pdf — Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks, dated 2010-07-21, fetched 2026-09-03
2009 antelope stats.pdf — Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks, dated 2009-07-22, fetched 2026-09-03
2008 ANTELOPE_stats.pdf — Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks, dated 2008-07-28, fetched 2026-09-03
2007 ANTELOPE_stats.pdf — Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks, dated 2007-08-06, fetched 2026-09-03
2006 ANTELOPE_stats.pdf — Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks, dated 2006-08-07, fetched 2026-09-03
2013 dea detailed bonus point stats.xlsx — Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks, dated 2013-08-12, fetched 2026-09-03
2012 dea detailed stats1.pdf — Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks, dated 2012-10-26, fetched 2026-09-03
2011 dea detailed statistics.xls — Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks, dated 2011-08-09, fetched 2026-09-03
2010 dea detailed statistics.xls — Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks, dated 2010-07-23, fetched 2026-09-03
2009 dea detailed statistics.xls — Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks, dated 2009-07-23, fetched 2026-09-03
2008 dea detailed statistics.xls — Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks, dated 2008-07-31, fetched 2026-09-03
2007 dea detailed statistics.xls — Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks, dated 2007-10-30, fetched 2026-09-03
2006 dea detailed statistics.xls — Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks, dated 2006-09-11, fetched 2026-09-03

Other licences in these districts

Antelope licence 514-00 Antelope licence 514-20 Antelope licence 516-20 Antelope licence 526-20 Antelope licence 530-20 Antelope licence 536-20 Antelope licence 540-00 Antelope licence 540-20 Antelope B licence 530-10 Antelope B licence 530-30 All Montana antelope All Montana species

Bonus points are one of Montana's two point systems and the only one that applies here. The other, preference points, exists on nonresident combination licences alone and works in the opposite way. See how these numbers are produced and checked, or the Montana application deadlines.